Pentucket Regional School Committee

School Committee Minutes 2004

January 6, 2004 January 20, 2004 February 3, 2004
February 10, 2004 February 24, 2004

March 2, 2004

March 9, 2004

March 23, 2004

 April 6, 2004

 May 11, 2004

May 18, 2004

June 1, 2004

June 15, 2004

  July 13,  2004

July 20, 2004

August 3, 2004

August 24, 2004

 September 7, 2004

September 21, 2004

October 19, 2004

November 9, 2004

November 17, 2004

December 7, 2004

 December 21, 2004



January 6, 2004

Approved: February 3, 2004

 

PENTUCKET REGIONAL SCHOOL COMMITTEE

Central Office

Middle School

January 6, 2004

Members present: Chairman Castiglione, Mrs. Andrews, Mr. Young,

Dr. Littlefield, Mrs. Nelson, Mrs. Darke, Ms. Blades, Mr. Buell, Mr. O’Keefe,

Mr. Cronin, Mrs. Grazio, and Mrs. Muench

Also present: Dr. MacLean, Dr. McGinn, Mr. Gibson, Principal Mrs. Townes,

Student Representative Miss Burns, Spectators and Press

Call to Order

Chairman Castiglione called the meeting to order at 7:33 p.m.

Majority Vote

The majority vote was 5.5.

Agenda

It was moved by Mrs. Nelson and seconded by Mr. O’Keefe to accept the agenda as amended. The agenda was amended to add a discussion on the packets. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

Consent Agenda

It was moved by Mr. O’Keefe and seconded by Mr. Young to accept the consent agenda as amended. The amendments were to remove the minutes from December 2, 2003, the Bagnall PTA letter, and the Finance Reports. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, O’Keefe, Nelson, Muench, Darke, Blades, Cronin, Andrews, Young, Littlefield)(abstained: Grazio)(for: 9.8)(abstained: 1.1)

Delegation

Coaches Blane Goguen and Pamela Endyke introduced the student members of the high school’s science team. The team competes in the North Shore Science League.The league is comprised of 26 North Shore public and private high schools. Currently, the team ranks 4th among the 26 team leagues.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. O’Keefe and seconded by Mr. Young to approve the minutes of December 2, 2003, as amended. The first amendment was to correct the spelling of tuitioning on the second page. The second amendment was to change the word squad to SWOT on the third page. The first paragraph on the fourth page was edited to say that Mrs. Darke said that school choice at the Bagnall was the preferable option rather than cutting a teacher. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, O’Keefe, Muench, Blades, Grazio, Darke, Cronin, Young, Littlefield, Andrews)(abstained: Buell)(for: 10.9)(abstained: 1.1)

Mr. Buell arrived at 7:50. The majority vote changed to 6.1

Bagnall PTA Letter

Mrs. Grazio asked how the District was handling the winter months regarding transportation. Dr. MacLean said that winter schedule is in effect from December 15th through April 15th. He said buses have been added in all three towns. He said that people that did not buy a pass in the fall could purchase a winter pass for $72.

Finance Minutes

Mrs. Grazio questioned the quorum on December 17th at the Finance Subcommittee.

She said that there were only two members of the subcommittee present, although there were other School Committee members there. She said she is concerned because this deals with the signing and the approval of the warrants. Chairman Castiglione said that the full Committee votes the approval of the warrants. Mrs. Grazio said that the law allows the full Committee to have a subcommittee consisting of at least three members. Mr. Castiglione said that the motion that was made at the time of the Committee reorganization stated that any active member could be an active participant in any subcommittee. Mrs. Grazio said that this conflicts with the law. Members would like to review the minutes on that vote.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mrs. Grazio and seconded by Mrs. Muench to direct the Superintendent to get in writing from the Department of Revenue the procedure that would satisfy all requirements to review and approve warrants and to release checks. This would include answering the following questions: Do we require signatures? If so, how many? If the Finance Subcommittee does not meet, what are the requirements? If there were no Finance Subcommittee, would the warrant number and amount meet the requirements? Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Blades, Muench, Grazio)(opposed: Nelson, Young, Cronin, Andrews, Littlefield)(for: 7.7)(opposed: 4.3)

Dr. Littlefield said that she is not interested in discussing this motion, and she is not interested in getting a written opinion. She said she would like to move on, and she would like this in the record.

Executive Session, Chapter 39, Section 23, B.3.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mrs. Nelson and seconded by Mrs. Darke to enter into Executive Session, Chapter 39, Section 23, B.3. for the purposes of discussing negotiations, and a grievance. Motion carried by roll call vote. (unanimous approval)

Administrative Reports

Groveland Water and Sewer Agreement

Members received a copy of the agreement as drafted by the Groveland Water and Sewer. Mr. Gibson made the following comments:

  • The Sewer Easement and Dedication are in perpetuity and the Memorandum of Understanding is for 25 years. This appears to be inconsistent.
  • The following comments refer to the Memorandum of Understanding:

2.7 The driveway and sidewalk should be returned to its original condition.

3.3 The District cannot comply with this paragraph.

           4.1.4 This paragraph is worrisome.

9.1 The first sentence is okay; the second sentence would be difficult to comply with.

18.2 Same comment as 4.1.4.

  • Mr. Gibson would like to see a perpetual sewer and water rate decrease for all three schools services by the commission.

Mrs. Grazio would like the School Committee to discuss this issue before it goes to legal counsel. Members would like Mr. Gibson’s concerns and suggestions in writing.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mrs. Grazio and seconded by Mrs. Muench to add the Groveland Water and Sewer Agreement to the next executive session agenda. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, Buell, O’Keefe, Muench, Grazio, Blades, Cronin, Andrews, Littlefield, Young)(abstained: Darke)(for: 10.9)(abstained: 1.1)

District Personnel Classification System

Dr. MacLean said that on November 26th members received a status report on the Districts’ job descriptions. Since then several job descriptions in the central office have been revised. Dr. McGinn has also added a draft of the CORI procedures.

Chairman Castiglione commented that the District already has a CORI policy. Dr. MacLean said that this would accompany the policy. It would be used as the regulations to follow MASC’s format. The administration would then use these CORI regulations when conducting CORI checks. Dr. MacLean recommends these regulations be added, as this involves extensive research on the records of individuals.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mrs. Grazio and seconded by Ms. Blades to add wording to the CORI policy that the District already has in place, and that this policy be enforced in accordance with the attached procedure. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

Mentoring Program Update

Dr. MacLean met with the Mentoring Program Committee on January 6th. He is pleased with the progress. They had a discussion on skill sets and the evaluation process. He mentioned at the time of the global overview to the Committee that he would like the mentoring committee to come in and update the School Committee.

Discussion followed:

  • Members questioned the timeliness of the program. The contract states that the pilot should have started this year and the program should be in full effect in the fall of 2004.
  • Dr. McGinn responded by saying that the schedule has been discussed several times by members. The language to have the program up and running this year was put into the contract in January. There was a significant lag time, and the contract was not signed until June. The Committee began their work in the fall.
  • Dr. McGinn said that the Committee is seeking out as much information as they can, as well as researching exemplary programs while identifying elements to create a noteworthy Pentucket program. Dr. McGinn has encouraged the Committee to come to a School Committee meeting to present what they feel most strongly about.
  • There should be a budgetary expectation put in place immediately.
  • At this time the District does not have a mentoring program in place. The District has an induction program in place led by Irene Thomas. Administrators, principals, and team leaders support new teachers. Members would like to see the District adhere to the schedule in the contract.
  • Dr. MacLean commented on the contents of the program. He said that one of the most important ingredients is for the District and the teachers in the program to have a common understanding of what the purposes of mentoring is. He also said there should be a clear outcome for both the mentor and the mentee. He said there should be a clear sense of how people are selected for this program. Dr. MacLean said that the District needs to look at the kinds of skill sets and the training that is necessary for the people to become mentors. Finally, he said the program should be evaluated on whether or not it is working. Dr. MacLean recommends that the School Committee work with the people who are on the Mentoring Committee (administrators and teachers) to craft something that will be successful. Dr. MacLean is confident that this can be done this academic year.
  • Mrs. Grazio said that she thought Dr. MacLean’s idea was excellent and it should be put in a formal agreement with the union.
  • Mr. O’Keefe had two concerns. The District needs to be able to budget something in this program so that there is some type of conclusion before that process begins. Second, Mr. O’Keefe commented that this is systematic of many incidents, where the idea of getting to an outcome becomes secondary to the process. He said we need to have things completed within a certain time period and if that means getting together and putting in a little more time to accomplish that, then that is what has to be done.
  • Members questioned whether or not the union could grieve this issue.
  • Dr. MacLean does not recommend piloting a program in the middle of the year. He recommends starting the piloting program in the fall.
  • Dr. Littlefield said that she was surprised that the District did not have a mentoring program since it was mandated by Ed Reform which was passed in 1994.
  • Mrs. Grazio mentioned that the District does have a mentoring program in place in this District. It has been in place since the early 1980’s. There has been money in the budget.
  • The next scheduled mentoring Committee meeting is January 28, 2004. At that time,
  • they anticipate nominating elements of a mentoring program from their individual research.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. O’Keefe and seconded by Mr. Cronin to direct the Superintendent and the Assistant Superintendent to present the mentoring program to the School Committee at the first business meeting in March. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, O’Keefe, Darke, Blades, Muench, Grazio, Cronin, Littlefield)(opposed: Buell, Young, Andrews) (for: 9.3)(opposed: 2.7)

Budget Format

There was a brief discussion:

  • Mr. Buell wanted it stated in the record that during the discussion of the FY05 budget that he was under the impression that the line item detail would be available to the Committee and is concerned that it will not be.
  • Mr. Cronin said the reason it is not available for FY05 is because during the budget process the numbers are changing and being recalculated during the process.
  • Mr. Gibson said that it would be available once the budget is approved and it is put into the computer.
  • Line item detail is available from individual sites in a different format.
  • Changes will be explained in narrative form.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Mr. Buell to accept the Business Manager’s format for the budget and to have all questions regarding the budget be put in writing to the administration. Questions and answers will be listed in a separate section of the business meeting’s agenda. There was a friendly amendment to have the subtotals put at the bottom of the page. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Muench, Young, Cronin, Andrews, Littlefield)(opposed: Blades, Grazio)(for: 9.8)(opposed: 2.2)

Central Office Reorganization

There was a brief discussion:

  • Members would like to see a cost comparison.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. O’Keefe and seconded by Mrs. Darke to continue the meeting past 10:00 p.m. Motion failed. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, O’Keefe, Darke, Cronin, Andrews)(opposed: Buell, Blades, Muench, Grazio, Young, Littlefield)(for: 6.0) (opposed: 6.0)

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mrs. Darke and seconded by Mr. Buell to meet on January 13th to finish the agenda. Motion carried. (for: Nelson, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Blades, Muench, Grazio, Cronin, Andrews, Littlefield)(opposed: Castiglione)(abstained: Young)

(for: 10.1)(opposed: 1.1)(abstained: .8)

The meeting was recessed at 10:08 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,

Marianne Naffah

Recording Secretary

 

January 20, 2004

Approved: February 4, 2004

 

PENTUCKET REGIONAL SCHOOL COMMITTEE

Central Office

Middle School

January 20, 2004

Members present: Chairman Castiglione, Mrs. Andrews, Mr. Young,

Mrs. Nelson, Mrs. Darke, Ms. Blades, Mr. Buell, Mr. Cronin, Mrs. Grazio,

and Mrs. Muench

Also present: Dr. MacLean, Dr. McGinn, Mr. Gibson, Student Representative

Miss Burns, Spectators

Delegation

Dr. MacLean introduced Jeff Rooney and the Freshman Class Officers. They received special recognition from the School Committee for the community service project that they did. They collected toys and books for the Salisbury Boys and Girls Club. The Club is a place for children to go between the hours of 2:00 and 7:00 to play games, sports, read or do their homework.

Call to Order

Chairman Castiglione called the meeting to order at 7:58 p.m.

Majority Vote

The majority vote was 4.6

Agenda

It was moved by Mrs. Nelson and seconded by Mrs. Darke to accept the agenda. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, Darke, Blades, Muench, Grazio, Young, Cronin, Andrews)(opposed: Buell)(for: 9.0)(opposed: 1.1)

Consent Agenda

It was moved by Mrs. Darke and seconded by Mrs. Nelson to accept the consent agenda as amended. The amendments were to remove the minutes from January 6, 2004. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, Buell, Darke, Blades, Muench, Andrews, Young, Cronin)(opposed: Grazio)(for: 9.0)(opposed: 1.1)

The minutes of January 6, 2004 were corrected as followings: The first amendment was to correct the spelling of SWOT on the first page. The second amendment was to correct the Motion/Vote on page 2: It was moved by Mrs. Grazio and seconded by Mrs. Muench to direct the Superintendent to get in writing from the Department of Revenue the procedure that would satisfy all requirements to review and approve warrants and to release checks. This would include answering the following questions: Do we require signatures? If so, how many? If the Finance Subcommittee does not meet, what are the requirements? If there were no Finance Subcommittee, would the warrant number and amount meet the requirements? Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Blades, Muench, Grazio)(opposed: Nelson, Young, Cronin, Andrews, Littlefield)(for: 7.7)(opposed: 4.3) Members wanted the following comment added to page 4:

Dr. Littlefield said that she was surprised that the District did not have a mentoring program since it was mandated by Ed Reform which passed in 1994.

Ms. Blades arrived at 8:08 p.m. The majority vote changed to 5.1.

Executive Session, Chapter 39, Section 23, B.3.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Young and seconded by Mrs. Andrews to enter into Executive Session, Chapter 39, Section 23, B.3. for the purposes of discussing negotiations and a grievance. Motion carried by roll call vote. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, Muench, Darke, Blades, Grazio, Cronin, Young, Andrews)(opposed: Buell)(for: 9.0)(opposed: 1.1)

Administrative Reports

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mrs. Darke to remove the NEASC report from the agenda. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

Monthly Financial Report

Mr. Gibson gave members a Monthly Budget Report dated January 6, 2004.

There was a brief discussion:

  • Tuition out is projected to be $120,000 over budget. The District received the first circuit breaker payment of $34,000. The projection is to receive $137,000. The state may fall short of this amount. This is not a receipt the District budgeted for.
  • The District has nine former employees drawing unemployment. The budget deficit should not exceed $120,000. Employees that did not have their contracts renewed were entitled to unemployment benefits.
  • Ninety-five teachers have signed up for the District’s Contributory 403B program. This will cost the District $19,000 in FY’04.
  • The District has 24 students attending a charter school and 37 students attending out-of-district choice schools for a total of 61 out of district placements for which we must pay. We have 64 choice students attending Pentucket. Last year’s tuition for students attending charter schools was approximately $6,600. Our tuition in rate for choice students is approximately $3,900. The state sets the tuition rate. There is a serious shortfall.
  • If there is a deficit in the medical trust, it must be counted against E&D.
  • The Business Manager recommends that the District pay the sick leave buy back in FY’05. This will allow the Chapter 70 funds to come in before payment.
  • The School Committee requested a list of unaccounted increases for the full year.

FY05 Budget

  • Next week Dr. MacLean and Mr. Gibson will begin budget hearings with site managers. The District proposal will be ready for dissemination January 29th.
  • The Superintendent gave members a preliminary draft of the FY05 Budget. This draft makes the following assumptions: Chapter 70 and 71 will remain constant. Appropriation from E&D will not occur. Programs and services will be preserved at current levels. Programs and services supported by other resources, enterprise funds will continue to be supported by these funds.
  • Mrs. Grazio would like to have a discussion on the revolving accounts and fees. Chairman Castiglione responded that the Finance Subcommittee would have the presentation for early February.
  • Several members would like to take a look at the services and programs that we have before they are automatically renewed. Dr. MacLean said that he gave the members a preliminary draft of the FY05 budget. He said this represents what it will cost the District next year doing business the same way as it is does today, with the same money available and from the same sources. He asked members what core programs they would like to preserve.
  • Mr. Castiglione asked if the Committee should be having a conversation on the assumptions prior to the completion of the budget. The Committee would like to have a presentation on how much the programs in the District cost.
  • Dr. MacLean asked the members two questions: What should the PRSD offer in program and services? What should PRSD stop offering in programs and services?
  • Dr. MacLean has had preliminary conversations with the Finance Directors in the three towns.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Mrs. Andrews to direct the administration to have, in the next packet for the next meeting, their recommendations for school choice, the number of students, where the students would go, what impact it would have on class size, enterprising funds on fees, the amount of those fees, and all of the revolving accounts. There was a friendly amendment to include how many choice students would be graduating. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, Buell, Darke, Blades, Young, Cronin, Andrews)(present: Muench)(abstained: Grazio)(for: 7.9)(present: 1.1)(abstained: 1.1)

  • Dr. MacLean said he would also provide the Committee with information on how the general fund is supported by other sources of revenue.
  • Mr. Buell would like the administration to look at possible reductions in administration district wide. He said he would like all options on the table. He said this was not discussed last year.
  • Mr. Young said that there is no fluff in this budget. He said last year’s money was taken out of E&D, fees were put in place for sports and parking, and class sizes are up to capacity.
  • Chairman Castiglione said there are two debates. The first is that the Department of Education has the hard, fast, facts that this District is very efficient in terms of dollars and cents. Secondly, he respects the community having the right to make the decisions on if they can afford the growth in the District’s budget.
  • Dr. MacLean said there are approximately 55 districts in the state. Pentucket ranks at 50th in terms of pupil spending. This is a lean budgeted. That means that decisions should be made on the basis of what the community and the Committee value.

Personnel Job Description Update

Dr. McGinn informed the Committee that he would present them with a draft of the District’s recruitment/retention strategic plan during the first week in February. The plan will include a vision and mission statement, goals and objectives, strategies and tasks,

timelines, and the individuals responsible for the plan’s various tasks. Dr. McGinn plans to announce the 2004/05 anticipated vacancies by mid February. These openings are for the 16 people that are retiring.

  • Job descriptions for MIS Director, Webmaster/Technician, Assistant Principals, AD,

and Coaches will be added.

Policy

Members received the PRSD Policy Manual. It is the Superintendent’s recommendation to approve this as a first reading.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Young and seconded by Mrs. Darke to accept the Policy Manual as a first reading as presented. Motion failed. (for: Young, Cronin)(opposed: Castiglione, Nelson, Buell, Darke, Blades, Muench, Grazio, Andrews)(for: 1.6)(opposed: 8.5)

  • Mrs. Grazio said there were several pieces missing. She also said there were duplications and that it did not always take into effect that we are a regional school district.
  • Mrs. Muench said that most of the work that was already done was not in the book. Mrs. Muench also said that some of the policies do not reflect the regional agreement and some of the policies are redundant. Mrs. Muench commented that the PRSD adopted policies have been changed.
  • Mrs. Nelson asked if it could be adopted as a draft and then work on the policies that need to be addressed.
  • Dr. MacLean recommended that the Committee adopt the policies that had no issues and put others on hold. He said that this is an opportunity to move the manual forward and then have a subcommittee work on the policies that need revisions.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mr. Cronin to adopt only the policies that members did not have any objections to. Motion was not voted on.

  • Dr. MacLean requested a copy of the disc that the subcommittee worked on. He said he would forward it to MASC and give members a paper copy of it.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mrs. Nelson and seconded by Mrs. Darke to continue the meeting past 10:00 p.m. Motion failed. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, Darke, Andrews, Cronin)(opposed: Buell, Blades, Muench, Grazio, Young)(for: 4.9)(opposed: 5.2)

Adjournment

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Young and seconded by Mrs. Andrews to adjourn the meeting at 10:05 p.m. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

Respectfully submitted,

Marianne Naffah

Recording Secretary

 

February 3, 2004

Approved: February 10, 2004

Distributed: Website and I. Buerger, PAT

 

PENTUCKET REGIONAL SCHOOL COMMITTEE

Central Office

Middle School

February 3, 2004

Members present: Chairman Castiglione, Mrs. Andrews, Mr. Young,

Mrs. Nelson, Mrs. Darke, Ms. Blades, Mr. Buell, Mr. Cronin, Mrs. Grazio,

O’Keefe and Dr. Littlefield

Also present: Dr. MacLean, Dr. McGinn, Mr. Gibson, Principals, Mrs. Townes, Mrs. Kline, Mrs. Jervey, Mr. Harrison, Mrs. Perry, Assistant Principal, Mrs. Wilson, Director of Pupil Services, Kathleen O’Brien, Student Representative, Miss Burns, Spectators and Press

Delegation

Caitlyn Burns gave the Committee an update on the Student Council activities at the high school. There will be a "Parents Night Out" on February 13th. The annual Blood Drive will be on March 4th. The Battle of the Bands is scheduled for March 20th. March Madness is a week dedicated to Pentucket students. The Senior Sendoff is scheduled for late May. There is a group of 50 Pentucket students dedicated to spreading peace around the high school. They are called Pentucket Project Peace.

Call to Order

Chairman Castiglione called the meeting to order at 7:38 p.m.

Majority Vote

The majority vote was 5.1.

Agenda

It was moved by Mrs. Darke and seconded by Mrs. Nelson to accept the agenda as amended. The amendments were as follows: 1) to add a letter of condolence, 2) to add the GAP program to administrative reports, and 3) to add a discussion on budget meeting dates and the January 23rd FYI. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

Consent Agenda

It was moved by Mr. O’Keefe and seconded by Mrs. Nelson to accept the consent agenda as amended. The amendments were to remove the minutes from January 13, 2004. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Blades, Andrews, Littlefield, Cronin)(opposed: Grazio)(abstained: Young)(for: 9.0)(opposed: 1.1)(abstained: .8)

Mrs. Grazio asked for clarification on the consent agenda. Chairman Castiglione said that the committee is accepting and filing the items that need to be accepted and filed. He said that they are approving the items that need approval.

Minutes

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Mr. Buell to accept the minutes of January 13, 2004 as amended. The amendments were as follows: On the first page the first sentence was rewritten to read, "Ms. Blades questioned the Director of Special Education assuming the role of Director of Pupil Services." Ms. Blades also questioned that the Director of Pupil Services would be taking on the enrichment role, guidance department, and working on special education appeals. Ms. Blades wanted it added that Dr. MacLean said that the Director of Pupil Services would be willing to take on these additional services without additional pay. Mrs. Grazio wanted it added that she questioned that once a position has been eliminated, how can the savings be carried year to year? Mrs. Grazio also wanted it added that Ms. Blades was concerned over the special education legal issues and questioned how the appeals would be handled. Mrs. Grazio wanted it added that she asked for the rationale and costs on all outsource tasks. She also wanted comparisons of positions and costs as to what is in the FY04 budget and what is in the FY05 budget regarding the reorganization plan. Mrs. Grazio mentioned that the Chair ended the debate on the central office reorganization. He was challenged by Mrs. Grazio and no vote was taken. On the third page under School Improvement Plans, Mrs. Grazio wanted the comment added that the Committee had the plans for more than thirty days and that they were already approved. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, O’Keefe, Buell, Blades, Darke, Grazio, Young, Cronin, Andrews)(abstained: Littlefield)(for: 10.1)(abstained: .8)

Mrs. Grazio suggested that the Committee put their requests in the form of a motion as a directive to the administration.

Mr. Young arrived at 7:42 p.m. The majority vote changed to 5.5

Ms. Blades asked how to address the administration with regard to when the Committee asks for something to be in the next packet, and it’s not there? She gave an example of the vote taken on January 20th requesting information on choice, enterprising funds, and revolving accounts. Dr. MacLean said that some of that information was in the budget that the Committee received at this business meeting. Ms. Blades requested a copy of Mr. Gibson’s contract. Chairman Castiglione asked the Superintendent to respond in the next packet. Dr. MacLean said that he would review the minutes and give members copies of the minutes.

Mr. Buell requested the District to send a letter to the Grabowski Family with condolences on the death of their son.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mr. O’Keefe to direct the District to send a letter to the Grabowski Family in West Newbury extending condolences on the death of their son. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

Administrative Reports

Budget

Dr. MacLean gave the Committee an overview of the FY05 Budget. He discussed the following topics:

  • Education Funding Crisis
  1. Education Reform Act of 1993 intended to raise standards and improve funding.
  2. PRSD has reduced class sizes and upgraded curriculum.
  3. FY03 revenues have plummeted.
  4. FY04 revenues remained the same. PRSD balanced its budget with user fees, enterprise programs, tuition students and spending down the rainy day account.
  • FY05 Budget Overview
  1. PRSD consistently scores in top quartile in MCAS
  2. PRSD ranks 47th out of 51 regional school districts in per pupil spending
  • FY05 Budget Assumptions
  1. Maintain programs and services
  2. Anticipate $123 K increase in Chapter 70 funds
  3. Anticipate $90K increase in transportation aid
  4. Maintain athletic and co-curricular fees
  5. Reduce transportation user fees
  6. Continue enterprise accounts
  7. Leave rainy day account (E&D) alone
  • School to School Comparisons
  1. Bagnall 20.1 to 1
  2. Page 19.8 to 1
  3. Sweetsir 19.6 to 1
  4. Donaghue 22.1 to 1
  5. FY05 per pupil spending $250 per student at each elementary school
  6. Average teacher salary – varies according to experience/credits
  • Program Improvements in the following areas:
  1. Curriculum and Technology Integration
  2. School-Wide Enrichment
  3. Special Education Coordination
  4. Foreign Language Coordination
  5. Word Processing
  • Reductions in Programs and Services in the following areas:
  1. Eliminate two English electives and increase 9/10 class size
  2. Eliminate two Psychology sections and increase class size in 11/12 Social Studies class sizes
  3. Eliminate Statistics and increase Math class sizes
  4. Eliminate Russian and increase Foreign Language class sizes
  5. Reduce 8 sections of Word Processing
  6. Eliminate Health and Physical Education in Grade 11
  7. Eliminate one classroom teacher at the Page School
  8. Reduce approximately 5 or 6 paraprofessional positions
  9. Implement Central Administration Reorganization Plan

Dr. MacLean suggested each principal give a brief overview of their budget. Mrs. Kline gave an overview on categories one, two and three. Chairman Castiglione said that his expectations were to have any changes in the budget noted in a narrative. Mr. Cronin agreed. Chairman Castiglione wanted to hear from the elementary principals regarding per pupil spending at each school. He also wanted to hear from principals if there is a relationship between the educational background on our teachers and student performance.

Mr. Cronin said that the expectations were to have the FY04 budget with a narrative on all changes. He said this would give all necessary information. Mr. Buell asked if the actual working documents based on object were available. Dr. MacLean said that this information would not be put into the computer until the budget process was completed.

Chairman Castiglione said that all questions should be sent to the Superintendent. Everyone would share in the responses. They will be added to the agenda by way of a question and answer section.

Mrs. Grazio said she would like to see the same level of detail on the central office. She said that the budget did not have a narrative on the central office. Dr. MacLean responded that it is in the central office reorganization plan.

Dr. Littlefield was concerned with what had to be done by the principals for Thursday’s packet. Mr. Buell wanted it in the record that he did not want any additional work created by the principals. He said that their job is to be in the buildings not doing paperwork. Dr. MacLean said that the principals would have to give him the information.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mrs. Andrews and seconded by Mr. O’Keefe to have the packet sent out on Friday, February 6, 2004. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

Mr. O’Keefe asked Mrs. Townes how the high school cuts would effect the school. Mrs. Townes said the choices made had to be effective choices. One example she gave was in English, their goal was to keep class sizes the same. They also wanted to continue to offer the writing lab in the ninth and twelfth grade level and to offer the same rigor in terms of the AP courses so that students would continue to do as well on MCAS scores.

Dr. MacLean said that from a philosophical standpoint, it is essential to preserve kinds of programs that are rigorous. You can compress others so that you maintain the highest level of offerings, while dropping other offerings that are lower at the college prep courses. While at the same time, maintaining a comprehensive high school moving towards meeting the NEASC recommendations. Dr. MacLean said there is more opportunity for reductions at the high school. He said at the elementary level class sizes would increase. Mr. Buell questioned the .6 reduction in foreign language and how it would effect class size. Mrs. Townes said that it is just an estimate at this time. Mr. Buell is concerned about the class sizes in foreign language.

Mrs. Nelson asked Ms. O’Brien for her insight with the changes in her position. Ms. O’Brien said that it will not have an inpact on special educational programs, and she is willing to try.

Mr. O’Keefe asked principals how the cuts in last year’s budget effected the educational experience in each building. Mrs. Wilson responded by saying that the foreign language classes have 34 students in them. She is anticipating 31 in each class next year. Mrs. Jervey said that the PTO has been very supportive by buying computers. They lost aides in the building and the ESP’s have taken on cafeteria and recess duty. The biggest impact has been the reduction in the kindergarten class. There is no aide and they are relying on parent volunteers. Mrs. Wilson is concerned about the core facility. The roof is leaking and there are problems with the heating system. Mrs. Townes said that there has been an additional burden placed on the office in collecting fees for athletics and parking. Mrs. Perry said that she has relied heavily on her revolving accounts. She said that she is concerned with the repairs that the building needs. Mrs. Kline said the elimination of the 6th grade position has increased class sizes. She also lost her ESP’s in kindergarten level. She was not able to order the Scott Foresman for the 2nd grade. The bus fees have increased traffic to the school.

Mrs. Grazio is concerned that the District is facing a deficit and she is not sure if the general public realizes this deficit. Chairman Castiglione would like added to next week’s packet the non-general fund resources that are being used to meet the basic programming needs as well as the outside sources.

Mr. Cronin asked Dr. MacLean if there was any sense from the finance directors on what they could contribute. Dr. MacLean said a general sense would be a couple hundred thousand per town.

German American Partnership

Ms. Buerger gave a brief overview on the German American Partnership program. It is a non profit organization. A group of German students come to our District in the fall and the Pentucket students go to Germany in June. This program has been extremely successful for students.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mrs. Grazio to approve the German American Partnership program for 2004. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

Chairman Castiglione said that he would like to take the balance of the items on the agenda and have them put first on the next meeting. Members agreed to meet on February 10th. Mrs. Nelson suggested an additional meeting. Mr. Buell agreed. Chairman Castiglione said it would be decided on the 10th.

Executive Session, Chapter 39, Section 23, B.3.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Mrs. Andrews to enter into Executive Session, Chapter 39, Section 23, B.3. for the purposes of discussing negotiations and a grievance. Motion carried by roll call vote. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, O’Keefe, Darke, Blades, Cronin, Young, Andrews, Littlefield)(opposed: Grazio, Buell)(for: 8.7)(opposed: 2.2)

 

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mrs. Nelson and seconded by Mrs. Darke to accept the language recommendations from the Insurance Advisory Council regarding the second insurance plan to replace the master medical plan. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, O’Keefe, Darke, Blades, Grazio, Young, Cronin, Andrews, Littlefield)(abstained: Buell)

(for: 9.8)(abstained: 1.1)

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mrs. Nelson and seconded by Mrs. Andrews to accept the provisions on Chapter 32 B (sections 9, 9D ¾, and 18) as presented by the Insurance Advisory Council. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, O’Keefe, Darke, Grazio, Young, Cronin, Andrews, Littlefield)(abstained: Buell, Blades)(for: 8.7)(abstained: 2.2)

Strategic Planning Subcommittee Report

Mr. O’Keefe updated the Committee on the meeting that took place on January 27, 2004. The Superintendent presented the Pentucket Four Stage Curriculum Review Process. The Superintendent also informed the subcommittee that he would be presenting his fact-finding regarding the Bagnall School to the full Committee.

The subcommittee discussed the following issues regarding the Regional Agreement:

1) supplemental language, 2) method of assessment, 3) page 4 section C regarding individual town’s option to provide additional funding to elementary schools, 4) stabilization funds, and 5) 2/3 majority for budget approval.

The following determinations were made, and where appropriate, are being forwarded to the full Committee for adoption.

1) Adopt and incorporate Chapter 71, Section 16B of Mass General Laws in its entirety as a replacement for Section X. This would have the effect of eliminating the distinction between the base budget and supplemental budget, and put us in compliance with state law. 2) This would also address the method of assessment. In that context, the subcommittee recommends that "choice out" students be included when determining student participation for each town. 3) The subcommittee recommends leaving the language regarding stabilization funds as is. 4) The subcommittee was unable to reach consensus regarding the right of individual towns to provide additional funding to elementary schools.

The next meeting is scheduled for February 10, 2004, at 6:00 p.m. The subcommittee will discuss the following topics: 1) number of members, 2) quorum requirement, 3) Chapter 71 16A.

There was a discussion regarding the base and the supplemental budgets. Members discussed the use of these terms and strategies for the FY05 budget.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. O’Keefe and seconded by Mrs. Nelson to continue the meeting passed 10:00 p.m. Motion carried. (for: Nelson, O’Keefe, Darke, Cronin, Andrews, Littlefield)(opposed: Castiglione, Buell, Blades, Grazio, Young)(for: 5.7)(opposed: 5.2)

The meeting was recessed at 10:10 p.m. It will continue on February 10, 2004.

Respectfully submitted,

Marianne Naffah

Recording Secretary

February 10, 2004

Approved as Amended: March 2, 2004

Distributed: Website, I. Buerger, PAT

 

PENTUCKET REGIONAL SCHOOL COMMITTEE

Central Office

Middle School

February 10, 2004

Members present: Chairman Castiglione, Mrs. Andrews, Mr. Young,

Mrs. Nelson, Mrs. Darke, Ms. Blades, Mr. Buell, Mr. Cronin, Mrs. Grazio,

O’Keefe, Mrs. Muench, and Dr. Littlefield

Also present: Dr. MacLean, Dr. McGinn, Principals, Mrs. Townes, Mrs. Kline, Mrs. Jervey, Mr. Harrison, Mrs. Perry, and Mrs. Wilson, Director of Pupil Services, Kathleen O’Brien, Student Representatives, Miss Burns and Mr. Hutchison-Maxwell, Spectators and Press

Call to Order

Chairman Castiglione called the meeting to order at 7:38 p.m.

Majority Vote

The majority vote was 5.5.

The meeting on February 3, 2004, was recessed to February 10, 2004. Chairman Castiglione continued the meeting with the agenda from February 3, 2004, adding a discussion on budget meeting dates and the FYI dated January 23, 2004.

Consent Agenda

It was moved by Mr. O’Keefe and seconded by Mrs. Nelson to accept the consent agenda. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, Buell, Young, O’Keefe, Darke, Blades, Andrews, Littlefield, Cronin)(opposed: Grazio)(for: 9.8)(opposed: 1.1)

Mrs. Muench arrived at 7:42. The majority vote changed to 6.1.

Chairman Castiglione presented members with data on budget facts, FY05 budget proposal issues, and FY05 finances. The data showed where Pentucket ranks across the state in terms of spending. The source of this information was from the Department of Education. It was taken from the finance information that the District is required to provide every year. Chairman Castiglione suggested that the budget discussion start with the FY04 budget, where the District is now and where it will be in June 2004.

Dr. MacLean showed the Committee a review of the actual revenue in both state aid and community contributions from the past several years. Dr. MacLean anticipates a 1% increase in state aid. He said that the FY05 budget would require a 12% increase in contributions.

Dr. MacLean provided members with "profit/loss" data on school choice. The District has a deficit in choice of $68,681 in terms of tuition out to date. The District has taken $109,000 out of the general fund to pay for things they had hoped choice money would have paid for. The total deficit is $177,681. Without the 38 new students, the total deficit would be $326,641. The tuition rate is set by the per pupil expenditure allocated by each town/district and it is done by the state. Dr. MacLean proposed 27 additional choice students at the elementary and 33 at the secondary level.

Other sources of revenue for this year’s budget came from a variety of sources totaling approximately $640,000. There are additional expenses in the FY04 budget with the 403B plan, unemployment, school choice out deficit, school choice in deficit, and SPED tuition. These additional expenses total $397,816. The District also has additional revenue from SPED circuit breaker and the bond refinance. This additional revenue totals $417,128.

FY05 Budget

The FY05 budget proposal has approximately $600,000 in reductions in category one.

This includes replacing 16 retirees at step one, the savings in the central administration reorganization, building "administration" positions, elimination of one teacher at the Page School and eliminating 6.5 FTE at the high school.

Ms. Blades asked Dr. MacLean for clarification on the dollars budgeted for the business manager. Dr. MacLean said he did his budget based on budget to budget, not actual to actual. Mr. Buell asked if the vote that the Committee took previously for a full time Business Manager for July 1, 2004, was still in effect. Chairman Castiglione said that it was, and there should be a discussion on it.

Ms. Blades questioned the stipend money. Dr. MacLean said that he used some of it for reimbursements to members that went to the MASC conference, school committee supplies, and mailings. Dr. MacLean said that any money that is not spent would go back into the general fund. At the end of the year it will goes toward the deficit or stays in the E&D fund. Mrs. Grazio said that she is not comfortable with where the District is in FY04 and how much there is in E&D. Dr. MacLean said that the November budget report showed anticipated expenses and the revenue that would be necessary to cover those expenses. The report did not take into consideration the circuit breaker money that has come in or the savings on the refinancing. Dr. MacLean said that the amount of the deficit in the health care trust is not final to date. He also said that if the Committee decides to pay the money for the sick leave buy back in June, there would be an additional deficit.

Mrs. Grazio asked the Committee for a consensus on discussing an override. Dr. Littlefield objected. Everyone else agreed. Chairman Castiglione clarified that the 1.4 million dollar shortfall assumed some reductions, additional choice students, and fees.

Ms. Blades suggested that the Committee start with the 1.4 million dollar shortfall and add back in reductions what the Committee would like to put back in to get a final number. The Committee added back what it said to represent a 2.2 million dollar deficit.

The following items were added back:

  • Superintendent’s reductions $600,000
  • Teacher at the Page School
  • Teacher at the Donaghue School
  • Reduction of fees, transportation, sports and activities
  • 60 choice students
  • Reading Specialist for Sweetsir

Dr. Littlefield asked Mrs. Townes if there is growth in the budget to cover recommendations from NEASC. Dr. McGinn said that it is budgeted in high school professional development. There is also funding available from grants.

Dr. Littlefield asked if there was any data on student performance in foreign language based on class size at the middle school level. Dr. Littlefield said that if the District did some tracking on curriculum and the achievement and the success on how students do, it would help make decisions on where to put the money. Mrs. Townes said that the information that is available is: that the District has three languages, four different levels, and the number of students enrolled. She added that the enrollment has increased in the past five years. Mr. Buell agreed with Mrs. Wilson that class sizes in foreign language should be small. He said it went beyond antidotal, beyond statistical, it’s a fact and a priority.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Dr. Littlefield and seconded by Mr. Buell to direct the Superintendent to assess the current program outcomes of the foreign language curriculum at the middle school to see if the current service delivery is the best way to meet the intended objectives and present data to the Committee. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, O’Keefe, Darke, Cronin, Andrews, Littlefield)(opposed: Buell, Blades, Muench, Grazio, Young)(for: 6.8)(opposed: 5.2)

Mrs. Grazio said the regional agreement gives the formula for the number for the base budget and the balance goes into the supplemental. Dr. MacLean said there would be a supplemental budget. Dr. MacLean said that he has spoken to all of the finance directors in the District. He is anticipating $600,000 to $800,000 in excess of this year’s assessment. Mrs. Grazio would like to go to the towns to see if they will pay before making any cuts. Mr. Cronin said it would be best to put forward what is reasonable to maintain programs and services, but also to put forward what is responsible for a budget.

Mrs. Andrews said that the Committee needs to decide what they value and what they are willing to cut. She said the Committee should present something that is fiscally responsible. Mrs. Darke agreed. Chairman Castiglione clarified by saying that presently the Committee was unwilling to move on existing programming. Chairman Castiglione continued to say that he began this meeting by looking at where this District is in its spending relative to the other communities in this Commonwealth. This District is in the lowest quartile in its spending and the top quartile in performance. How long can spending at the lower levels that the District is spending and sustain that activity? He said that the District was able to do what the community wanted them to do last year.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mrs. Grazio and seconded by Mr. Buell to move forward with the budget (2.2 million dollar shortfall) as is, maintaining current programs next year (level programming) without accepting the Superintendent’s cuts. Motion failed: (for: Young)(opposed: Castiglione, Nelson, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Blades, Muench, Grazio, Cronin, Andrews, Littlefield)(for: .8) (opposed: 11.2)

Mr. Cronin said that he is more interested in a compromise. There should be cuts to programs where they can be cut. We rely on the administration to make those cuts. Communities decided not to support the budget last year. The parents stepped up and paid the fees. Mr. O’Keefe said when asking administration what they wanted back in the budget, not a single principal said they wanted it all back. He said that the Committee has not looked into non-programming reductions. Mrs. Nelson said the Committee lacks the data to make the decisions on what should be kept and what should be cut.

Mrs. Grazio said the open hearing should be the presentation of the budget after the Committee has gone over it. Mr. Cronin said that if the Committee does that, they are not valuing what the public has to say.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr.O’Keefe and seconded by Mr. Buell to continue the meeting past 10:00 p.m. Motion carried. (for: O’Keefe, Nelson, Castiglione, Buell, Muench, Grazio, Darke, Cronin, Young, Littlefield, Andrews)(opposed: Blades)(for: 10.9)(opposed: 1.1)

Members requested further information on the following:

  • Second look at non-programming costs (administration)
  • Cost of Lacrosse program
  • Revisit decisions surrounding foreign language and ESP’s
  • Family and Consumer Science
  • Electives (oceanography and photography)
  • Review condensing school blocks and leveling at high school
  • Textbook purchases

Adjournment

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mrs. Grazio and seconded by Mrs. Darke to adjourn the meeting at 10:25 p.m. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

Respectfully submitted,

Marianne Naffah

Recording Secretary

 

February 24, 2004

Approved as Amended: March 9, 2004

Distribution: Website, and I.Buerger, PAT

 

PENTUCKET REGIONAL SCHOOL COMMITTEE

Auditorium Open Hearing

Middle School

February 24, 2004

Members present: Chairman Castiglione, Mrs. Andrews, Mr. Young,

Mrs. Nelson, Mrs. Darke, Ms. Blades, Mr. Buell, Mr. Cronin, Mrs. Grazio,

Mr. O’Keefe, Mrs. Muench and Dr. Littlefield

Also present: Dr. MacLean, Dr. McGinn, Mr. Gibson, Principals, Mrs. Townes, Mrs. Kline, Mrs. Jervey, Mr. Harrison, Mrs. Perry, Mrs. Wilson, Director of Pupil Services, Kathleen O’Brien, Student Representatives, Miss Burns and Mr. Maxwell-Hutchison, Spectators and Press

Call to Order

Chairman Castiglione called the meeting to order at 7:38 p.m.

Majority Vote

The majority vote was 6.1.

Agenda

It was moved by Mr. O’Keefe and seconded by Mrs. Nelson to accept the agenda as amended. Ms. Blades requested that the Superintendent provide copies of all emails sent between school committee members, from school committee members to administration and from administration to the school committee members dating back to July 1, 2003, and have them in the March 9, 2004 packet. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

Consent Agenda

It was moved by Mr. O’Keefe and seconded by Mrs. Nelson to accept the consent agenda. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, O’Keefe, Nelson, Buell, Darke, Young, Andrews, Cronin, Littlefield)(opposed: Muench, Blades, Grazio)(for: 8.7)(opposed: 3.3)

Administrative Reports

Dr. MacLean gave the Committee a brief update on the budget. The budget has a 2.2 million-dollar deficit between revenue and projected expenses. At the February 10th School Committee meeting the Committee added back the reductions that the Superintendent had made. Those reductions included replacing the retirees at a mid range level instead of an entry level, the reductions in the central office and the administration throughout the District. The reductions made at the high school were added back in, along with the reductions of fees for transportation, sports and activities, 60 choice students, the reading specialist at the Sweetsir, a teacher at the Bagnall, and one at the Donaghue.

Dr. MacLean explained to the Committee that there is a deficit in School Choice for FY04 of $24,804. His recommendation was to bring in 60 new choice students, as well as replacing the seven that are graduating for FY05. This option would bring in $248,412 in revenue for FY05.

Dr. MacLean has had brief discussions with the finance directors from the three towns, and he anticipates approximately $600,000 in growth from the towns.

Dr. MacLean gave the Committee data on FY05 Budget Reductions Revised Options.

It included the following:

  • Replacing retirees at various steps
  • Not replacing retirees in the positions of I.T., Science, and Business at the high school
  • Central office reorganization
  • Building "administration" positions
  • Eliminating additional positions at the high school in music, visual arts, English, foreign language, health, special education support ESP’s, library aide, and a guidance aide

Dr. MacLean said that the consequences from these cuts would be with the variety the District is able to offer and class sizes would increase in Physical Education and Health. Russian would be cut completely. There would be more study halls.

The following were comments made from the members and the audience.

  • Parents had concerns regarding the cuts. Some felt as though the District was not trying to maintain services. Chairman Castiglione responded that there has been no growth in the FY04/05 in revenue. The options are to create revenue or cut expenses. The Committee feels they are not cutting core issues. The growth on the teacher contract was necessary to stay competitive and now the District needs help financing that problem.
  • Some community members are concerned with the cuts at the high school. It was commented that this was a District problem and the cuts should be district wide. Mrs. Grazio said that if we continue to raise class sizes and lower offerings we are going to run the risk of more choice out students and that will make the District less appealing. Mrs. Grazio asked why students were going out of District. Dr. MacLean responded that twenty-three students are going to the charter school, which is a Montessori Charter School. He said that some students attend school closer to where their parents are working. Some attend different schools due to the school offerings.
  • There were concerns regarding the override if it fails. Would teachers be cut?

Community members suggested that the Committee be very clear what is in the override and what the consequences would be if it failed. They suggested the information should be presented to the towns early.

  • Mrs. Hart, Fine and Performing Arts Department Head, Mr. Goguen, Science Department Head, Mr. Voltero, English Department Head, and Mrs. Brophy, Health Coordinator, advocated to not have any cuts made to their programs.
  • Some community members felt the District should implement fees and not cuts. Some said parents took the hit last year and paid the fees, now it is time for the community to step up to the plate.
  • Mrs. Grazio asked the Superintendent if the cost savings from the central office reorganization would be spent on outsourcing the payroll and, in fact, outsourcing the payroll would cost more than the savings. Dr. MacLean said that is the only task that would be outsourced. He said that the data from an outsource placement would be beneficial to the administration and the payroll clerk would be able to do more work on employee benefits. Mr. Buell questioned the cost of outsourcing the payroll. Dr. MacLean responded $12,000. Mr. Buell does not feel that the convenience of outsourcing the payroll is worth the cost.
  • Dr. Archibald, West Newbury Finance Member, said that there is growth in the towns as well. He said taking away any revenue enhancements would be a mistake. He said it would send a bad message to the community. He commented that perception is very important.
  • Mrs. Leonard mentioned that the quality of the schools in the towns effects the real estate value. She also mentioned that the School Committee couldn’t campaign for an override.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mrs. Nelson and seconded by Mrs. Andrews to have a choice analysis study done to answer the questions: Why students are coming into the District? Why student are leaving the District? Why students that are coming into the District choose Pentucket? Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mrs. Grazio to have the District approach the towns with the same level of programming and level staffing for FY05 that is in place for FY04. There was a friendly amendment to allow the Superintendent to make minor department head style changes. Motion carried. (for: Buell, O’Keefe, Blades, Muench, Grazio, Young)(opposed: Castiglione, Nelson, Darke, Cronin, Andrews, Littlefield)(for: 6.3)(opposed: 5.7)

Chairman Castiglione said that it would be a mistake if the Committee moved forward with a number that didn’t show that it made an effort to attempt to deal with the deficit at hand. If the School Committee continues to say don’t cut any programs and yet there is no conversation about what is core to the mission, he said the Committee is losing the opportunity to protect the core issue. Chairman Castiglione would like to see the Committee meet the community at some point. Mr. Buell said he would like to do that with fees. He said programs and staffing cuts would do damage to students. Mrs. Grazio said that it would be very clear what the District would be asking the towns for. She does not agree with the fees. She said it is time to have the towns take a hard look at what education costs and give them the opportunity to say yes. Dr. Littlefield said the Committee should put together a packet that is responsible to our principals and students and then show some fiscal restraints. Mr. Young said that if programs were cut they would not come back.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. O’Keefe and seconded by Mr. Young to support the Superintendent’s recommendation for rehiring salaries for elementary and English teachers at entry level and for math teachers at the bachelors 5, or the masters 4 level for a total of $595,182. revised 05 figure. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

Dr. MacLean will adjust the FY05 budget to reflect a full time Business Manager.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mrs. Darke to continue activity fees and athletics into FY05, the same as FY04 with the same parameters (caps and waivers). There was a friendly amendment to have the same format apply to the Lacrosse program. Motion carried. (for: Nelson, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Blades, Muench, Cronin, Andrews)(opposed: Castiglione, Grazio, Young, Littlefield)(for: 8.2)(opposed: 3.8)

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Young and seconded by Mr. Buell to have the parking fees the same for FY05 as they were in FY04. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, Buell, O’Keefe, Grazio, Muench, Grazio, Blades, Cronin, Young, Andrews)(opposed: Littlefield)(for: 11.2)(opposed: .8)

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mrs. Nelson to continue the meeting past 10:00 p.m. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, O’Keefe, Darke, Cronin, Andrews, Littlefield)(opposed: Buell, Blades, Muench, Grazio, Young)(for: 6.8)(opposed: 5.2)

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Mrs. Nelson to add choice students not to exceed a total of 120 students. Motion failed. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, O’Keefe, Darke, Cronin, Andrews)(opposed: Buell, Blades, Muench, Grazio, Young, Littlefield)(for: 6.0)(opposed: 6.0) Mr. Young reconsidered his vote. Motion carried: (for: Castiglione, Nelson, O’Keefe, Darke, Cronin, Andrews, Young)(opposed: Buell, Blades, Muench, Grazio, Littlefield)(for: 6.8)(opposed: 5.2)

Mr. Young said that he, historically, has been opposed to choice because the intent of choice has been completely ruined. It was supposed to be for enhancement. It has become necessary. He said he looked to administration. They have looked carefully at their buildings and their classrooms. Mr. Young said he has confidence in the administration and the Superintendent.

Dr. MacLean said that he would like to discuss the pros and cons of the Supervisory Options that he gave the Committee at the next meeting.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Mr. Young to adjourn the meeting at 10:25 p.m. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

Respectfully submitted,

Marianne Naffah

Recording Secretary

March 2, 2004

Approved: March 23, 2004

Distributed: Website, PAT, I. Buerger

 

PENTUCKET REGIONAL SCHOOL COMMITTEE

Middle School

March 2, 2004

Members present: Chairman Castiglione, Mrs. Andrews, Mr. Young,

Mrs. Nelson, Mrs. Darke, Ms. Blades, Mr. Buell, Mr. Cronin, Mrs. Grazio,

Mrs. Muench and Dr. Littlefield

Also present: Dr. MacLean, Dr. McGinn, Mr. Gibson, Principals, Mrs. Townes,

Mrs. Kline, Mrs. Jervey, Mr. Harrison, Mrs. Perry, Mrs. Wilson, Director of Pupil Services, Kathleen O’Brien, Student Representative, Miss Burns, Spectators and Press

Absent: Mr. O’Keefe

Call to Order

Chairman Castiglione called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m.

Majority Vote

The majority vote was 5.0.

Mrs. Muench arrived at 7:40 p.m. The majority vote changed to 5.5.

Agenda

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Mrs. Nelson to accept the agenda as amended. Ms. Blades requested commenting on the article in Globe North on Regional Agreement Budgets. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, Buell, Grazio, Muench, Darke, Young, Cronin, Andrews, Littlefield)(opposed: Blades)(for: 9.8)(opposed: 1.1)

Consent Agenda

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Mrs. Andrews to accept the consent agenda as amended. The amendment was to remove the minutes dated February 10, 2004. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, Buell, Darke, Muench, Young, Andrews, Cronin, Littlefield)(opposed: Blades, Grazio)(for: 8.7)(opposed: 2.2)

Minutes

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Mrs. Nelson to approve the minutes of February 10, 2004, as amended. The amendments were as follows: The first motion on page three was rewritten to read, "It was moved by Dr. Littlefield and seconded by Mr. Buell to direct the Superintendent to assess the current program outcomes of the foreign language curriculum at the middle school to see if the current service delivery is the best way to meet the intended objectives and present data to the Committee." On page 4, the first line was amended to remove, "He would like to go back to the towns with an override." Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, Buell, Muench, Darke, Young, Andrews, Cronin, Littlefield)(opposed: Blades)(abstained: Grazio)(for: 8.7)(opposed: 1.1)(abstained: 1.1)

Administrative Reports

Mentoring Program Update

Dr. McGinn gave the Committee a brief update on the second draft of the Mentoring Program. Dr. McGinn and Dr. MacLean have concerns with the qualifications of the mentor and the mentor teacher criteria. Specifically, the group has designed a process

that relies on a principal or an assistant principal for a recommendation and the administration feels strongly that the substance needs to be enhanced for the principal

to lean on in order to provide that recommendation. They are also working on the descriptive for the kinds of qualities and skills of the individuals who would like to become mentors. This group is trying to establish a very distinguished group of Pentucket mentors.

Dr. McGinn is working on compensation.

The training was established after the group had an interview with teacher 21. They train mentors and proposed a training schedule. Dr. McGinn has identified grant money to pay for the training. Dr. MacLean estimates the program to cost $40,000.

Dr. Littlefield commented that the group did an outstanding job. She said the plan is extremely detailed with backup. All bases have been covered.

Supervisory Options

Dr. MacLean gave members data on supervisory options. Dr. MacLean said his intent was to provide continuity in the development and implementation of curriculum, in particular, at the secondary level. Dr. MacLean would like to take advantage of the high school in terms of scheduling and leadership.

A brief discussion followed.

  • Chairman Castiglione asked members for a list of criteria to give the Superintendent. Some members said that K – 12 curriculum coordination, budget savings, professional development, and evaluations were the priorities.
  • Mrs. Grazio asked if the changes needed to be negotiated. Dr. MacLean answered yes to the degree that it has an impact on members of the teachers bargaining unit.
  • Mrs. Andrews said that Option K should be looked at. The principals are the coordinators of K – 6 and they could start with 7 – 12 economically. She commented on the size of the high school and would like to look at the option of dividing it into smaller sections.
  • Mr. Young said that it would be easier to work into the secondary level at the beginning and then blend the elementary coordination with that group over a one to three year period of time. In terms of moving forward, he would like to look at the option that include the secondary level first and then pull in the elementary level. There is a distinct difference between secondary and elementary in the terms of professional skills and background.
  • Some members would like to see fewer options. Some would like to see job descriptions with definitions included on facilitator, coordinator, and department heads.
  • Dr. MacLean said there is only one option with significant savings, option K. Dr. MacLean will report back to the Committee at the next meeting with fewer options and with cost savings.

High School Scheduling Options

Mrs. Townes presented the Committee with a Seven Period Drop Schedule with one long lab block. Six classes meet daily with one of them being a lab period of 82 minutes in the morning. The classes rotate on a 7-day cycle. Their goal is to increase time in

each class and create "lab" time that would allow not only Science classes but also all classes to have a block of time to use a variety of instructional strategies. This schedule would allow for more time on learning. This schedule would address the NEASC recommendations.

Mrs. Townes said that a block schedule would be implemented over a three-year period of time with professional development. She said that going to a block schedule would impact electives for ninth and tenth grade students. They would not have the opportunity to participate in Fine and Performing Arts or in Foreign Language. Band could be moved to before or after school. Mrs. Townes’ concern is in the collaboration between the principal, the department chairs and the teaching staff to move together with professional development so that the additional time in the classrooms is used to increase student achievement. Mrs. Townes said that the longer lab period would allow the high school to eliminate the extra lab period students and teachers have in AP Biology and AP Chemistry. Teachers would be able to teach an additional section of Science. It would allow Social studies, English, and Math more time to do projects and to do presentations. It would also allow Foreign Language teachers the opportunity to use technology to enhance the delivery of instruction.

A brief discussion followed:

  • Mr. Cronin said that this is the time to move forward with this schedule. In keeping with the NEASC recommendations, it would also provide more time on learning, free up funds and improve the efficiency in personnel.
  • Dr. Littlefield said that this was the time to comply with the NEASC recommendations.
  • Chairman Castiglione said the NEASC report provides a framework for looking at potential changes to the way we provide services, which may or may not have an impact on the District. The document states that there is a need for some changes at the high school. The Superintendent has offered perspective on that with budget cuts and the Committee rejected that. Ms. Blades said that the NEASC report should be a separate discussion. Since the report was received two years ago, the Committee has not had a discussion. She said that there has been no discussion on the changes that have taken place since the report. The report should be looked at in content. Mrs. Grazio agreed. She is concerned with electives and the cost. She asked if it needed to be negotiated with teachers.
  • Dr. MacLean said that this would be a modest change putting in one last period. Devoting the time between now and September to plan in the long run will provide tremendous learning opportunities for students and teaching opportunities. Chairman Castiglione said that based on last week’s vote that change could not be implement at this time. He said members would have to reconsider the vote from last week.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mrs. Grazio to look at school scheduling options and others in FY06 at the high school. Motion withdrawn.

Budget

The previous increase over FY04 budget was 2,570,000. The Committee added 60 choice students, activity fees, and replacing retiring teachers at a lower salary rate. The shortfall to date is $1,791,708. The Committee also added $16,000 back into the Business Manager’s salary increasing the Central Office Positions to $585,725.

Mr. Gibson said that the E&D account would be spent this year on the medical trust deficit. Mrs. Grazio asked why there is a difference in the amount from the auditor versus what is certified from the state. Mr. Gibson said when it went to the state it came back lower due to payroll taxes that the auditor did not pick up. Chairman Castiglione said that because the auditor is making the assumption to make up the operating deficiency, the District would have to charge it against E&D. There should be a vote of the Committee to transfer the money. He said the bottom line is there will be no funds available in E&D.

Chairman Castiglione said that after meeting with the Finance Committee members in the town, the District could anticipate $600,000 in new growth revenue. The total deficit is $1,791,708. Chairman Castiglione said there should be a base budget and a supplemental. Committee members agreed that it would be best to add the activity fees back into the budget and go to the towns for an override. They felt it would be harder to ask families to pay both fees and an increase in property taxes. Mrs. Grazio said the towns have to put forward the amount that the Committee requests.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mrs. Grazio not to implement the Lacrosse program. Motion failed. (for: Buell, Grazio)(opposed: Castiglione, Nelson, Darke, Blades, Muench, Young, Cronin, Andrews, Littlefield)(for: 2.2)(opposed: 8.7)

Members asked administration to do a recap on the budget for the next meeting. This should include the local assessment increases per town.

Adjournment

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mrs. Grazio to adjourn the meeting at 10:00 p.m. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, Buell, Darke, Muench, Grazio, Blades, Young, Andrews, Cronin)(opposed: Littlefield)(for: 10.1)(opposed: .8)

Respectfully submitted,

Marianne Naffah

Recording Secretary

 

 

March 9, 2004

Approved as Amended: March 23, 2004

Distribution: Website, PAT, I. Buerger

 

PENTUCKET REGIONAL SCHOOL COMMITTEE

Middle School

March 9, 2004

Members present: Chairman Castiglione, Mrs. Andrews, Mr. Young,

Mrs. Nelson, Mrs. Darke, Ms. Blades, Mr. Buell, Mr. Cronin, Mrs. Grazio,

Mrs. Muench, Mr. O’Keefe and Dr. Littlefield

Also present: Dr. MacLean, Dr. McGinn, Mr. Gibson, Student Representative,

Miss Burns, Spectators and Press

Call to Order

Chairman Castiglione called the meeting to order at 7:46 p.m.

Majority Vote

The majority vote was 5.5

Mrs. Muench arrived at 7:49 p.m. The majority vote changed to 6.1.

Agenda

It was moved by Mrs. Nelson and seconded by Mrs. Andrews to accept the agenda. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, Buell, O’Keefe, Grazio, Muench, Darke, Young, Cronin, Andrews, Littlefield)(opposed: Blades)(for: 10.9)(opposed: 1.1)

Consent Agenda

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Mrs. Andrews to accept the consent agenda as amended. The amendments were to remove the minutes dated February 24, 2004, and to comment on the emails. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Muench, Young, Andrews, Cronin, Littlefield)(opposed: Blades, Grazio)(for: 9.8)(opposed: 2.2)

Minutes

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mrs. Nelson to approve the minutes of February 24, 2004 as amended. The amendment was on page one under Administrative Reports to change the amount of $157,000 to $248,412. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, Buell, O’Keefe, Muench, Darke, Young, Andrews, Cronin, Littlefield)(abstained: Blades, Grazio)(for: 9.8)(abstained: 2.2)

Ms. Blades said that she is not receiving copies of all emails. She also said that the questions being answered by the administration are not being sent out to all members.

Administrative Reports

Budget

The Superintendent’s original budget proposal had a community contribution shortfall of $1,402,082. The budget was rebased and the current increase needed in local contributions is $1,626,950. This included expense adjustments of $692,606. The $692,606 represented the following adjustments: replace retirees at step 1, central administration reorganization, building administration positions, eliminating a teacher at

the Page School, eliminating 6.5 FTE at the high school, a reading specialist at the Sweetsir and Donaghue, restoring a teacher at the Bagnall, restoring a teacher at the

Donaghue. Other expenses included the choice fund shortfall and the retirement incentive increase. Athletic/Activity expenses covered by non-general fund account and an increase in transportation expenses totaled $187,815. The total shortfall requiring assessment increases totaled $2,405,242. Currently the School Committee approved the following offsets: new hires at a lower salary, 60 new choice slots, and athletic/activity fees. This totaled $778,292 and brings the current increase needed in local contributions to $1,626,950.

Chairman Castiglione presented the Committee with three scenarios on FY05 assessments: current budget, eliminating fees, and assuming $500,000 in new growth.

Discussion followed:

  • Mrs. Grazio asked why the October 1 report changed. Mr. Gibson said that there was an error on the first document because the West Newbury preschool was recorded incorrectly.
  • Mr. O’Keefe said that in looking at potential assessments with the towns, it is important to get a sense of how this effects individual taxpayers. What is the cost per town?
  • Mr. O’Keefe asked Dr. MacLean if he thought the District was prepared to go into a K – 12 curriculum or did he think the District should start with 7 – 12. Dr. MacLean answered 7 – 12. He said it is quite difficult to find talent that has the subject area skills and the processing skills for K - 12. He said this could be implemented with input from the elementary principals. Dr. Littlefield asked if the School Committee needs to vote on an in house decision made by the Superintendent. Dr. MacLean said yes if there are money implications. Mrs. Grazio said she is not comfortable making these changes with the governance at the high school at this late date. She would like to hear from the principals. Mrs. Grazio asked if the administration knew how the teachers felt and would it be negotiated? Dr. MacLean said yes it would be negotiated.
  • Mrs. Nelson said that before we embark on a reorganization there should be a discussion on current personnel classifications with accurate and up to date job descriptions. Mrs. Nelson asked how close the District is to having everyone have an accurate and up to date job description and evaluation criteria district wide. Dr. McGinn said that he has given members a calendar with a six-month schedule. He said that the task is in process. He said the information comes from various sources and it is not a quick process.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. O’Keefe and seconded by Mrs. Drake to move to accept Option K Supervisory Options. Motion failed. (for: O’Keefe, Littlefield)(opposed: Castiglione, Nelson, Buell, Darke, Blades, Muench, Grazio, Young Cronin, Andrews)(for: 1.9)(opposed: 10.1)

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Young and seconded by Mr. Buell to accept the total budget figure of $26,399,305 which includes choice, fees, and adjusted salaries for new hires. There was a friendly amendment to change the number to $27,368,079. Motion failed.

(for: Buell, Young)(opposed: Castiglione, Nelson, O’Keefe, Darke, Blades, Muench, Grazio, Cronin, Andrews, Littlefield)(for: 1.9)(opposed: 10.1)

Discussion followed:

  • Mr. Cronin said he would like to see a smaller number. Dr. Littlefield said that the Superintendent’s proposal was less and she would not support this number.
  • Mr. Buell said he would like to hear from members regarding fees. Mrs. Grazio has concerns with going for an override and charging fees. She said the amount should be put out to the community. Mrs. Darke said after attending the last tri town Finance Committee meeting, she agreed that the community does not want to pay twice. Mrs. Andrews has also heard from community member’s negative conversations on paying twice. She said some people are annoyed that nothing is being cut. Mrs. Nelson said that she has heard from community members and they are not going to be eager to pay fees and a property tax increase.
  • Mr. Young said there are two answers. Hopeful optimism and reality. Hopeful optimism would mean that everything would go through and people would vote for the schools. The reality is that the Committee will be back at the table to make cuts. He said the Committee supported and voted the teachers’ contract and knows they have to present the budget to the towns.
  • Mr. Cronin said the Committee has the responsibility to look at what we can for efficiencies, programs and curriculum. The District has one constituency, which is the voters. He said the responsibility should be shared with the children in the school that are using the services and a smaller override should be presented to the community.
  • Ms. Gadd, West Newbury Finance Committee, said that the District should charge fees if they want the towns support. The towns need to know that the District is doing

everything they can to get all available revenue.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell to accept the total budget figure of $27,368,079, eliminating the athletic and activity fees, increasing local contributions. The supplemental budget would be $1,815,932. Motion defeated.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mrs. Darke to rescind the athletic and activity fees. Motion failed. (for: Castiglione, Buell, Darke, Grazio, Littlefield)(opposed: Nelson, O’Keefe, Blades, Muench, Young, Cronin, Andrews)(for: 5.2)(opposed: 6.8)

Mr. Cronin said that the Regional Agreement reads that the District presents the supplemental budget which is the amount over last year and that it should be identified with the program and services that the District would lose if that supplemental budget is not approved. Chairman Castiglione said that for clarity, he would like to vote a budget and then decide what would be in the base and what would be in the supplemental.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Ms. Blades and seconded by Mrs. Grazio to start with the FY04 budget figure of $25,741,129 and add on a supplemental of 1,626,934. The total figure is

$27,368,078. There was a friendly amendment to reduce the central office supplies by $1. This motion includes: base operating assessment of $11,694,240, operating supplemental assessment of $1,626,949, capital base assessment of $373,543, and a

supplemental capital assessment of $68,129 for a total of $27,368,078. Motion failed. (for: Buell, Blades, Young)(opposed: Castiglione, Nelson, O’Keefe, Darke, Muench, Grazio, Cronin, Andrews, Littlefield)(for: 3.0)(opposed: 9.0)

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Mr. Buell to move forward with an operating budget of $27,000,000 and take the $368,079 and have the administration go back to the Committee with a plan of how those deductions could be made. Motion failed. (for: Nelson, O'Keefe, Cronin, Andrews)(opposed: Castiglione, Buell, Darke, Blades, Muench, Grazio, Young, Littlefield)(for: 3.8)(opposed: 8.2)

Mr. Buell asked for a compromise. Members received data on 1% site based cuts. Mr. Buell asked Dr. MacLean what that would entail. Dr. MacLean said that he would ask each site manager and the Special Education Director to make cuts at the 1% level. These cuts would be made in categories one, two and three.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Young and seconded by Mr. Buell to accept a total budget figure of $27,368,000. Motion failed. (for: Castiglione, Buell, Young)(opposed: O’Keefe, Darke, Blades, Muench, Grazio, Cronin, Andrews, Littlefield)(abstained: Nelson)(for: 3.0)(opposed: 7.9)(abstained: 1.1)

Dr. Littlefield said that the Committee should have put their trust in the Superintendent’s proposal. The principals were involved with the decisions and the cuts. Mrs. Grazio said that the Committee is doing their job. The Superintendent recommends a budget and it is the Committee’s obligation under statute to review the budget and bring it to the towns to ask for support.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Young and seconded by Mr. Buell to accept a total budget figure of $27,356,079. Motion failed. (for: Buell, Blades, Young)(opposed: Castiglione, Nelson, O'Keefe, Darke, Muench, Grazio, Cronin, Andrews, Littlefield)(for: 3.0)(opposed: 9.0)

The previous motion was made with the understanding that the School Committee stipends would be removed.

Mrs. Nelson commented on freezing administrative salaries for all non-bargaining units for a year. Mr. Young said that after the contract that was just signed for the teachers he disagreed with freezing administrative salaries. He said these people are the leaders of the District administrating education in our schools.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mrs. Darke and seconded by Mr. O’Keefe to continue the meeting past 10:00 p.m. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, O’Keefe, Darke, Blades, Muench, Andrews, Cronin((opposed: Young, Buell, Grazio, Littlefield)(for: 8.2)(opposed: 3.8)

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell with deep reservations and seconded by Mr. O’Keefe to rescind the motion on level staffing and make 1% cuts based on the discretion of the principals. Motion failed. (needed a 2/3 vote) (for: Castiglione, Nelson, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Cronin, Andrews, Littlefield)(opposed: Blades, Muench, Grazio, Young)(for: 7.9)(opposed: 4.1)

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mrs. Muench and seconded by Mr. Buell to accept a total budget figure of $27,348,568. This includes removing the stipends and keeping the central office the same as it is in FY04. Motion failed. (for: Buell, Blades, Muench, Grazio, Young)(opposed: Castiglione, Nelson, O’Keefe, Darke, Cronin, Andrews, Littlefield)(for: 5.2)(opposed: 6.8)

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mr. Cronin to suspend Robert’s Rules of Order to further debate with open conversation. Motion carried. (for: Nelson, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Young, Cronin, Andrews, Littlefield)(opposed: Blades, Muench, Grazio) (abstained: Castiglione)(for: 7.6)(opposed: 3.3)(abstained: 1.1)

Mr. Buell said that he would support a budget figure that included a 1% cut to each site base except the Bagnall, a budget number that removed the stipends of $12,000, the corrections totaling $12,000, and leaving the central office the same as it is in FY04.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. O’Keefe and seconded by Mr. Buell to rescind the previous motion on programs and services. Motion failed (2/3 vote needed). (for: Castiglione, Nelson, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Cronin, Andrews, Littlefield)(opposed: Blades, Muench, Grazio, Young)(for: 7.9)(opposed: 4.1)

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Mrs. Darke to continue the meeting past 10:30 p.m. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, O’Keefe, Darke, Blades, Muench, Cronin, Andrews)(opposed: Buell, Grazio, Young, Littlefield)(for: 8.2)(opposed: 3.8)

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mrs. Grazio to accept a budget figure of $27,074,568. This included removing the stipends of $12,000, the errors totaling $12,000, the central office reorganization of $7,511 and a 1% cut at the discretion of the Superintendent. Motion failed. (opposed: Castiglione, Nelson, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Blades, Muench, Grazio, Young, Andrews, Littlefield)(abstained: Cronin)(opposed: 11.2)(abstained: .8)

Chairman Castiglione said that this would probably focus on administration because the Committee has not agreed to rescind the vote on level funding on programs and services. Mr. Young said that this would attack the leadership of this District. With 16 teachers retiring, and more to follow, who will administer the mentoring program. We are trying to hire qualified, younger teachers with no leadership. Dr. MacLean said that it is

important to define what the Committee means as administrative. There are administrative positions in each building that are hybrid. Some are full time and some

are part time. Dr. MacLean said that administrators are also devoted to doing programs and service work. Ms. Blades agreed with Mr. Young.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Mr. Buell to accept a budget figure of $27,074,426. This included the FY04 budget of $25,741,129, the first voted supplemental figure of $1,626,950, minus the stipends of $12,000, minus the corrections of $12,000, minus the net central office reorganization of $7,511 and site base cuts of $262,142 not necessarily in each building. Motion failed. (for: Castiglione, O’Keefe, Cronin)(opposed: Nelson, Darke, Blades, Muench, Grazio, Young, Andrews, Littlefield)(abstained: Buell)(for: 3.0)(opposed: 7.9)(abstained: 1.1)

Members agreed that the supplemental should list exactly what will be cut if the override fails.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Ms. Blades and seconded by Mrs. Grazio to accept a budget figure of $27,336,568. This would include removing the stipends of $12,000, the central office reorganization of $7,511, and the corrections of $12,000. The supplemental is $1,595,439. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, Buell, Blades, Muench, Grazio, Young, Cronin, Andrews)(opposed: O’Keefe, Darke, Littlefield)(for: 9.0)(opposed: 3.0)

Adjournment

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mr. Cronin to adjourn the meeting at 10:53 p.m. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

Respectfully submitted,

Marianne Naffah

Recording Secretary

 

March 23, 2004

Approved: April 6, 2004

Distribution: Website, I. Buerger, P.A.T.

PENTUCKET REGIONAL SCHOOL COMMITTEE

                                                                               Middle School

                                                                               March 23, 2004

 

Members present: Chairman Castiglione, Mrs. Andrews, Mr. Young,

Mrs. Nelson, Mrs. Darke, Ms. Blades, Mr. Buell, Mr. Cronin, Mrs. Muench,

and Dr. Littlefield

 Also present: Dr. MacLean, Dr. McGinn, Mr. Gibson, Principal, Mrs. Townes,

Student Representative, Miss Burns, Spectators and Press

 Members Absent: Mr. O’Keefe and Mrs. Grazio

 Call to Order

Chairman Castiglione called the meeting to order at 7:44 p.m.

 Majority Vote

The majority vote was 5.0

 Agenda

It was moved by Mr. Young and seconded by Mrs. Darke to accept the agenda as amended. The amendment was to add the Supplemental Budget to Old Business. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, Buell, Darke, Young, Cronin, Andrews, Littlefield)(opposed: Blades, Muench)(for: 7.6)(opposed: 2.2)

Consent Agenda

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Mrs. Nelson to accept the consent agenda as amended. The amendments were to remove the minutes dated March 9, 2004, and the Finance Report dated March 16, 2004. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, Darke, Young, Andrews, Cronin, Littlefield)(opposed: Blades, Muench, Buell)(for: 6.5)(opposed: 3.3)

 Minutes

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mrs. Nelson to approve the minutes of March 9, 2004, as amended. The amendment was made on page 5 on the first motion. It was changed to read: “It was moved by Mr. Buell with deep reservation and seconded by Mr. O’Keefe to rescind the motion on level staffing making 1% cuts based on the discretion of the principals.” Motion carried. (for: Buell, Castiglione, Nelson, Muench, Darke, Young, Cronin, Littlefield, Andrews)(opposed: Blades)(for: 8.7)(opposed: 1.1)

 Finance Report

Ms. Blades mentioned that the Committee asked the Superintendent to seek advice on the warrant approval practice from the Department of Revenue in January and she has not received a response. Dr. MacLean said that he would look back in his records and respond at the next meeting.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mrs. Nelson and seconded by Mr. Young to approve the Finance Report dated March 16, 2004. Motion carried. (for: Buell, Castiglione, Nelson, Muench, Darke, Young, Cronin, Littlefield, Andrews)(opposed: Blades)(for: 8.7)(opposed: 1.1)

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mrs. Nelson to accept the donation from the West Newbury Youth Basketball Program  for the Page School. The motion included sending a thank you note to them. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 Administrative Reports

NEASC Report

Dr. MacLean began the discussion of the NEASC Report by contrasting the NEASC approach to accreditation with the approach of the Middle States Association of Colleges and Schools. This discussion focused on the areas of traditional accreditation and accreditation for growth.

 Dr. MacLean gave the Committee a Student Achievement Model. This model focused on three basis factors:

·         vision, mission, and learning expectations,

·         qualified staff,

·         aligned teaching and learning.

 Dr. MacLean recommended that the following areas be part of the Strategic Plan:

·         recruit, support, and retain highly qualified staff

·         align professional development with teaching and learning

·         align curriculum with standards

·         expand and differentiate instruction

·         increase student aspirations

·         focus on literacy and numercy K-12

·         target K-12 ELA and math

 Dr. MacLean reviewed the analysis of NEASC results in terms of:

·         strengths

·         weaknesses

·         opportunities

·         threats

·         implications

 Discussion and Comments throughout the Presentation:

·         NEASC is a group of professional people that volunteer to share their expertise.

·         Chairman Castiglione mentioned that there is an issue with the ability to assess whether or not there is a link between student learning expectations and the mission statement. What is stated in the mission statement should be the goals for the learning expectations of each child and the District needs to have curriculum and delivery in a manner that reaches those goals. There is a common disconnect throughout the report.

·         Ms. Blades questioned teachers not using the same rubrics and the grading system across the District. Dr. MacLean responded that in an abstract manner that is true and in a practical manner it is not always true.

·         Mrs. Nelson suggested that the District create a supporting document to align instruction with the mission and expectations in a measurable way to improve instructional practices as recommended by the NEASC.

·         Dr. Littlefield pointed out the first recommendation from NEASC, which reads: “Align written curricula to the mission statement and academic expectations.”

·         Dr. MacLean said that the next step is the global expectations which should be part of the Strategic Plan and also part of the planning with K – 12.

·         Chairman Castiglione commented on one of the weaknesses, which read: Opportunities for all students to meet expectations. He said in his opinion he would reduce the number of course levels. Mrs. Nelson pointed out the comment from the NEASC report, which read: PRHS currently offers five different course levels in major content areas for most grade levels. However, these student-grouping patterns do not reflect the diversity of the student body and do not foster heterogeneity.  They are also inconsistent with the school’s mission statement and expectations for student learning. Additionally, there is little concrete delineation regarding some of the levels and little rationale for their existence. Except for response to individual students who are experiencing academic difficulty, decisions about grouping are not visited or reviewed on a regular basis.

·         Dr. Littlefield said that all research shows that when you raise expectations and go to more heterogeneity groupings, achievement rises dramatically. She said that there is a concern in the NEASC report questioning if all students are being sufficiently challenged.

·         Chairman Castiglione said that as a school board the Committee has a role in influencing what the expectations are about student learning at all levels. He said that the principal is working within the parameters that the shareholders have defined for her and if the shareholders change those expectations the administration needs to act on it. The principal needs support. There have been positive steps with mentoring, curriculum mapping and staffing.

·         Mr. Buell commented on page 7, which stated: “The depth, breadth, and apparent rigor of the PRHS curriculum are impressive. However, the connection between the curriculum and the school’s mission and expectations for student learning has not yet been clearly established. Additionally, the current system at PRHS of assigning students to one of five ability groups for each course is of concern since curriculum maps are written only in general terms and do not differentiate between academic expectations for each level.” Mr. Buell said that the curriculum maps are in general forms. He suggests that they be written separately addressing each level of ability. Mrs. Darke brought the Committee’s attention to page 40: “PRHS currently offers five different course levels in major content areas for most grade levels. However, these student-grouping patterns do not reflect the diversity of the student body and do not foster heterogeneity.” Mrs. Nelson agreed calling the Committee’s attention to the statement: “Additionally, the lack of clearly differentiated curricula for each ability level leads to over-reliance on individual teachers to set expectations that may vary greatly in rigor.”

 ·         Dr. MacLean said that the weaknesses: “Opportunities for all students to meet expectations”, is a recommendation making sure that there are pathways for all students to achieve at all highest possible levels.

 Dr. MacLean discussed his action plan in terms of the activity, process, timeline, barrier(s) and the support (s). The activities include: establishing learning expectations per grade/per subject, establishing mentoring program, adopting differentiated instructional practices, establishing schedules to accommodate a variety of learning options, and establishing and executing a plan for school to school transitions.

 ·         Chairman Castiglione questioned the financial implication on this plan. Dr. MacLean said that the timeline of professional development would be effected. Chairman Castiglione was concerned that a large shortfall could mean the ability to achieve what the NEASC is asking the high school to achieve. Mr. Buell said he thought it could be done with very little adjustments. Dr. MacLean said that this would require adequate offerings in courses and adequate supervision. There would be stipends involved for people doing the mentoring. Some of the implications could be done with budget restraints.

·         Dr. McGinn said that when the District became regionalized in 1993, one primary reason was to bring three elementary schools together with common curriculum. When the frameworks was offered in 1993 and approved by the Department of Education then the project was launched and the primary focus was on K – 6. There was an assumption that 7 – 12 had an aligned curriculum.

·         Ms. Blades requested, in a future packet, block scheduling suggestions with the pros and cons and research with the pros and cons.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Ms. Blades to appoint Brian Young to the Whittier Regional Vocational School Committee. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, Blades, Muench, Darke, Cronin, Andrews, Littlefield)(opposed: Buell)(for: 7.9)(opposed: 1.1)

 Executive Session, Chapter 39, Section 23, B.3.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Young and seconded by Mrs. Andrews to enter into Executive Session, Chapter 39, Section 23, B.3. for the purposes of discussing negotiations and a legal issue. Motion carried by roll call vote. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, Buell, Darke, Cronin, Young, Andrews, Littlefield)(opposed: Blades, Muench)(for7 .6)(opposed: 2.2)

 Adjournment

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Young and seconded by Mrs. Nelson to adjourn the meeting at 10:00 p.m. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 Respectfully submitted,

 Marianne Naffah

Recording Secretary

 April 6, 2004

 

PENTUCKET REGIONAL SCHOOL COMMITTEE

                                                                               Middle School

                                                                               April 6, 2004

 

Members present: Chairman Castiglione, Mrs. Andrews, Mr. Young,

Mrs. Nelson, Mrs. Darke, Ms. Blades, Mrs. Grazio, Mr. Buell, Mr. Cronin,

Mr. O’Keefe, and Dr. Littlefield

 Also present: Dr. MacLean, Dr. McGinn, Mr. Gibson, Student Representatives,

Miss Burns and Mr. Maxwell-Hutchison, Spectators and Press

 Absent: Mrs. Muench

 Call to Order

Chairman Castiglione called the meeting to order at 7:38 p.m.

 Majority Vote

The majority vote was set at 5.5

 Agenda

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mrs. Darke to accept the agenda as amended. The amendment was to add the Business Manager’s contract to Old Business. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, Buell, O’Keefe, Grazio, Darke, Young, Cronin, Andrews, Littlefield)(opposed: Blades)(for: 9.8)(opposed: 1.1)

 Consent Agenda

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mr. O’Keefe to accept the consent agenda as amended. The amendments were to remove MASC Day on the Hill April 27, 2004, AFSCME Council 93, Email MGL Chapter 71, Section 16A, and Finance Reports March 16, 2004 and April 6, 2004. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, O’Keefe, Buell, Darke, Young, Andrews, Cronin, Littlefield)(opposed: Blades, Grazio)(for: 8.7)(opposed: 2.2)

 MASC Day on the Hill April 27, 2004

Mr. Buell mentioned that he would be attending the MASC Day on the Hill on April 27th. If anyone has any concerns, he would be pleased to represent the Committee.  

AFSCME Council 93

Dr. MacLean said that the AFSCME Council 93 is for the Custodians and for the Clerical employee’s contract. They are negotiating because they have a one-year contract.

 Email MGL Chapter 71, Section 16A

Mrs. Grazio questioned the email MGL Chapter 71, Section 16A. She asked if all of the questions regarding warrants (signatures and releasing checks) were sent into the Department of Revenue. Mrs. Grazio reminded members that the motion was to direct the Superintendent  to get in writing from the Department of Revenue the procedure that would satisfy all requirements to review and approve warrants and to release checks. This included several questions. Mrs. Grazio said she would forward her questions to Mr. Gibson and all members.

 Finance Reports March 16, 2004 and April 6, 2004

Ms. Blades asked if the Finance Reports are acceptable whereas there are concerns about the law. Chairman Castiglione said that the subcommittee makes the recommendation and the full Committee votes the approval. Chairman Castiglione said that the Committee would wait for advisory from the Department of Revenue. Dr. MacLean said that he would get that in writing.

 Administrative Reports

Mentoring Program

Dr. MacLean recommended the adoption of the Pentucket Mentoring Program. Principal Angela Jervey, Teachers Michael Stevens, Irene Thomas, and  Linda Brackett attended the meeting from the Mentoring Team.

 A brief discussion followed:

·         Dr. Littlefield asked if mentoring teachers were required to have a master’s degree. Mrs. Brackett said that it was not a state requirement and the mentoring teachers have to have their principal’s endorsement. Mr. Stevens added that there is language regarding continuing professional development.

·         Dr. Littlefield asked how the stipends were determined. Mrs. Jervey said the committee reviewed other programs and decided that an average of what others were doing would be satisfactory.

·         Mrs. Grazio requested an update on the plan before the budget process.  Mrs. Brackett said that there is a mid year assessment built in and an end of the year evaluation. Mr. Cronin asked how often they would be evaluated and reappointed. Mrs. Brackett said that there is a pool. Once a member is in they may stay in for three years. Principals may choose from that pool.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Ms. Blades to accept the mentoring program with the caveat that within a couple of weeks the Committee see language that mentors are reassigned annually by the recommendation of the mentor leader and their principal.  Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 Supplemental Budget

Dr. MacLean gave the Committee a copy of the budget that was approved on March 9, 2004. It has been updated with school data. It includes the assessments that were developed for each community, the budget summary and the amended narratives. Dr. MacLean gave out a power point presentation on the operating budget, data on teacher/class size comparisons, data on the override budget, and supplemental option two and override comparisons by school. Dr. MacLean started the discussion with the operating budget and the assessments for each community. Dr. MacLean said that the assessment increases for the operating budget from the three communities’ total $1,746,081. West Newbury Finance Committee voted a contribution of $150,000 with an override of $309,923. Groveland voted a contribution of $121,044 with an override of $520,000. Merrimac voted a contribution of $84,829 with an override of $560,285. The total override amount for the District totals $1,390,208. Assuming the District receives the money voted from the towns, Dr. MacLean recommended an override budget that totaled $1,393,651. Dr. MacLean gave detailed information by school and district wide on what would be cut if the override failed. Dr. MacLean said if the override passes,everything in the March 9th voted budget would be in place for FY05.

 Discussion followed:

·         Members agreed that the override budget should be very specific.

·         Dr. MacLean gave the Committee three scenarios for each school comparing teacher/class size. The first was done based on the School Committee approved March 9th budget. The second one was based on the Supplemental Option Two provided by the Superintendent. The second option totals $1,746,081 and would occur only if the District receives no money from the towns and the override passes. The third was based on the cuts totaling $1,393,651. This would occur if the school receives the money the towns voted and the override passes. Class sizes ranged from 17 on the first scenario to 28 on the second. These scenarios do not include the 60 additional choice slots. There will be a new special education program at the Page School in FY05.

·         Mr. O’Keefe said that the Committee needs to provide an additional opportunity for the towns to take this information in prior to the town meetings. He also asked the Committee:  “When are we going out to the community and where is that support going to come from?” Mrs. Nelson suggested putting the information on the District website. Mr. O’Keefe suggested one meeting in each town.

·         Mrs. Grazio commented that it ought to be a safe assumption that what is on the supplemental list as the supplemental budget is what will be cut if the towns do not vote it. Dr. MacLean suggested that another alternative to that is to be very straight forward and let people know what it is costing the District as option one, one year to the next, and then the rest of it is what they are willing to put on the line. It makes better sense to put that which is an override assuming the District receives the money from the towns. Ms. Blades said that the Committee should not make the assumption that they will get the money from the towns.

·         The cuts at the middle school level would mean one team would have two people instead of four. The school would go back to a middle school model. All programs would stay intact.

·         The six FTE teachers at the high school being cut would mean one per department. The reduction of one FTE department heads would be a reduction of .2 of the five department heads.

·         In the override budget proposal there are two anticipated special education out of district tuition’s totaling $30,000.

·         Chairman Castiglione asked Mr. Gibson to clarify the health benefit savings and the unemployment estimate as to whether or not it should be part of the equation because they are not currently in the equation and will only occur if the override fails.

·         Chairman Castiglione said that the last place he would cut would be teachers. Everything else is open for discussion. Mr. Buell agreed.

·         Members suggest freezing non-union wages, looking at program cuts, cutting the athletic budget and possibly a junior high model at the middle school. Chairman Castiglione recommended an administrative reorganization and shifting all athletics costs to fees.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mr. Young to approve the Superintendent’s version of the override budget. The motion was amended to support the Superintendent’s Supplemental Summary and to move forward with the override budget of $1,751,758. Changes were made under the District category to remove health benefits savings, unemployment estimate, and the business manager. Motion failed: (for: Young)(opposed: Castiglione, Nelson, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Blades, Grazio, Cronin, Andrews, Littlefield)(for: .8)(opposed: 10.1)

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. O’Keefe and seconded by Mr. Buell to approve the override budget in the amount of $1,393,651. There was a friendly amendment made under the District category to include only athletics/actives (entire athletic budget supported by fees), administrative reorganization including reductions, non-bargaining unit salaries freeze, transportation fees, and 2 FTE special education tuition’s @ $30,000 each. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Blades, Grazio, Young, Andrews, Littlefield)(opposed: Cronin)(for: 10.1)(opposed: .8)

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mr. Cronin to direct the Communications Subcommittee to develop the presentation of the budget information to the towns, with administration present, two weeks prior to the town meetings. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Blades, Young, Cronin, Andrews)(opposed: Grazio, Littlefield)(for: 9.0)(opposed: 1.9)

 Superintendent’s Evaluation

Chairman Castiglione gave members the opportunity to ask the Superintendent any questions they had regarding his self-evaluation. Chairman Castiglione asked members to turn their evaluations into Marianne Naffah no later than Thursday, April 15th. He will then compile the information and meet with the members to discuss the summary and then present it to the Superintendent.

 Dr. Littlefield wanted it in the record that she was amazed at the budget process the last two and a half months and found it not to be a good way to do business at the last hour and she is hoping that as the Committee moves forward everyone can learn from this year because all of this work should have been done before now.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mrs. Darke and seconded by Mr. Cronin to continue the meeting past 10:00 p.m. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Young, Cronin, Andrews, Littlefield)(opposed: Blades, Grazio)(for: 8.7)(opposed: 2.2)

 Business Manager

Chairman Castiglione said that the motion made by the full Committee was to have a full time Business Manager in place by July 1, 2004 and that is his expectation. Mrs. Grazio would like to set some time aside to discuss the contract including the salary and benefits.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mr. Cronin to have any interested School Committee member take part in the search, contract and benefit package, working with the Superintendent, to hire a full time Business Manager. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Nelson, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Grazio, Cronin, Littlefield)(opposed: Blades, Young, Andrews)(for: 8.2(opposed: 2.7)

 Adjournment

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Mr. Buell to adjourn the meeting at 10:10 p.m. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 Respectfully submitted,

 Marianne Naffah

Recording Secretary

 

 May 11, 2004

 

Approved: June 1, 2004

Distributed: Website, I. Buerger, PAT

PENTUCKET REGIONAL SCHOOL COMMITTEE

                                                                               Middle School

                                                                               May 11, 2004

 

Members present: Chairman Castiglione, Mr. O’Keefe, Mr. Levine, Mr. Buell,

Mr. Cronin, Mrs. Conner, Mr. Atwood, Dr. Littlefield, Mrs. Grazio, Mrs. Darke,

Mrs. Piccolomini, and Mrs. Muench

 Also present: Dr. MacLean, Dr. McGinn, Mr. Gibson, Student Representatives,

Miss Burns and Mr. Maxwell-Hutchison, Spectators and Press

 Call to Order

Chairman Castiglione called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.

 Majority Vote

The majority vote was set at 6.1.

 Agenda

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Mr. Levine to accept the agenda as amended. The amendment was to add the budget as the first item. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 Chairman Castiglione began the meeting welcoming new members; Thomas Atwood, Heather Conner, Jed Levine, and Maria Piccolomini.

 Consent Agenda

It was moved by Mrs. Darke and seconded by Mrs. Piccolomini to accept the consent agenda as amended. The first amendment was to remove the 2004 – 2005 school calendar.  The second amendment was to add a discussion to respond to the Merrimac resident’s complaint. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, O’Keefe, Buell, Darke, Cronin, Littlefield, Levine, Piccolomini, Conner, Atwood)(opposed: Muench, Grazio)(for: 9.8)(opposed: 2.2)

 Letter from Merrimac Resident

Mr. Buell suggested that the Superintendent respond to the complaint from the Merrimac resident to the School Committee. Mrs. Grazio and Mr. O’Keefe questioned whether or not that was necessary.

 School Calendar 2004 – 2005

Dr. Littlefield expressed concern that the elementary students and the students at the secondary level do not have the same half-day schedule. She said in consideration of working parents older siblings would be able to help out with younger siblings on these days. Dr. McGinn responded that if everyone had the same schedule the time for professional development would be shortened because the buses would have to be double run. Also, Dr. McGinn mentioned that principals have different reasons for the days they have chosen.

 Budget

Chairman Castiglione said that since the override failed in Merrimac the Committee had three options: 1. Accept that the override can not be afforded by all three communities and deal with the cuts that have been proposed. 2. Consider moving forward with the assessment based on two out of the three communities passing the budget and the assessments which is consisted with state law. 3. Under the guidelines of the Regional Agreement move forward with a lower figure than requested and rebase the assessments based on the lower number and approach the community again.

 Discussion followed:

·         Mr. Buell commented that the legal interpretation is that the federal law imposes itself on state law and that imposes itself on local law. He said the Regional Agreement is outdated and the Committee should go with the state law.

·         Mrs. Grazio said that the Regional Agreement is what the towns accepted and what the Department of Education signed off on. She said the Committee should make changes to the agreements and then meet with the town officials.

·         Dr. MacLean provided the Committee with a legal opinion from Finnegan & Bearse. Dr. MacLean said that the law trumps the agreement.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell to amend the figure of the Merrimac town floor to $560,285. Motion withdrawn.

 ·         On May 6th the Department of Education published its cherry sheet based on the new figures from the House and Senate. The District will receive $11,000 more in Chapter 78 money and $205,000 in transportation aid.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded Mr. Cronin to present new assessment figures to each town (Merrimac operating $564,944 and capital $25,171)(Groveland operating $561,380 and capital $25,012)(West Newbury operating $402,768 and capital $17,945) for a total supplemental assessment operating budget $1,529,092 and capital budget $68,129. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Levine, Buell, Darke, Piccolomini, Muench, Grazio, Conner, Atwood, Cronin, Littlefield)(opposed: O’Keefe)(for: 10.9)(opposed: 1.1)

 ·         Dr. MacLean clarified that the only number that changed was the supplemental operating and that is because the District is taking a more liberal approach.

·         Dr. Littlefield said that the discussion on how we can fund the schools should have taken place in the fall. She said the override was defeated and she can not support “changing the rules”.

·         Mrs. Grazio pointed out that the town of Merrimac voted down the method of payment and that the Committee could lower the number.

·         The Committee is not asking Merrimac to increase their taxes. They are asking them to fund the schools through their operating budget.

 Reorganization

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. O’Keefe and seconded by Mr.Cronin to have all members from all three towns be given the opportunity to be elected to any positions on the School Committee.  Motion was put aside.

 Discussion followed:

·         The rotation of the positions is in the bylaws. The bylaws would have to be amended.

·         Mr. O’Keefe said that the Committee is always talking about a regional outlook and how they operate. He also said it might be awkward for a member to have to take a position that they are not prepared for. Mr. Cronin added that if the Committee is well run, it is an asset to have consistency.

·         Mr. Buell said he did not agree. He said that most democratic bodies that include more than one community, rotate. He sees this as allowing each town an equal chance. According to the agreement, the officers had to be elected at this meeting.

·         Mr. Buell wanted it in the record that it appeared some people were prepared for this discussion and others were not.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Mr. O’Keefe to suspend Robert’s Rules of Order. Motion failed (need a 2/3 majority vote). (for: O’Keefe, Darke, Piccolomini, Cronin, Atwood, Littlefield)(opposed: Levine, Buell, Muench, Grazio, Conner)(abstained: Castiglione)(for: 5.7)(opposed: 5.2)(abstained: 1.1) 

Mrs. Muench nominated Mrs. Grazio for Chair. Dr. Littlefield nominated Mrs. Darke for Chair. Mrs. Darke was elected. The vote was 7.6 in favor of Mrs. Darke and 4.4 in favor of Mrs. Grazio.

 Mr. Atwood nominated Mr. Cronin for Vice Chairman. Mr. Buell nominated Dr. Littlefield.

Mr. Cronin was elected. The vote was 10.9 in favor of Mr. Cronin and 1.1 in favor of Dr. Littlefield.

 Mr. Castiglione nominated Mr. O’Keefe for Secretary. Mr. O’Keefe was elected. The vote was 10.9 in favor of Mr. O’Keefe and 1.1 abstained.

 Mr. Cronin nominated Mr. Atwood for Assistant Treasurer. Mrs. Muench nominated Mr. Buell. Mr. Atwood was elected. The vote was 6.5 in favor of Mr. Atwood and 4.4 in favor of Mr. Buell.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mr. O’Keefe to elect Anthony Repucci as Treasurer of the District. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 Dr. Littlefield asked the Superintendent to put together a calendar of meeting dates for the next year.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Castiglione and seconded by Mr. Cronin to have the School Committee meetings on the first and third Tuesdays of the month at 7:30 p.m. at the Pentucket Middle School. There was an amendment to have the meeting at another time and place deemed by the Committee. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mrs. Grazio to allow four members of the Committee authority to call a special meeting together by emailing or notifying the Chair. Motion carried. (for: Levine, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Piccolomini, Muench, Grazio, Conner, Littlefield)(opposed: Castiglione, Cronin, Atwood)(for: 9.3)(opposed: 2.7)

 Chairwoman Darke asked members to email her their subcommittee preferences.

 Superintendent and School Committee Member Communication

Dr. MacLean suggested to the Committee that if they had a request it be presented at a meeting so that all members could participate. However, he will respond to all requests.

Dr. MacLean also recommended that the School Committee meet with him for a workshop to discuss these issues.

 Mr. Castiglione suggested that the former and the current chair review the superintendent’s evaluation with the Superintendent and then provide the results to the full Committee. He said this was the recommendation from the MASC. Mr. Cronin agreed that would be the appropriate approach to take. Mr. Buell and Mrs. Grazio disagreed and said the discussion should be with the full Committee.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Castiglione and seconded by Dr. Littlefield to have the former and the current Chair go over the Superintendent’s evaluation with the Superintendent and then to report back to the full Committee. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, O’Keefe, Darke, Piccolomini, Conner, Cronin, Atwood, Littlefield)(opposed: Levine, Buell, Muench, Grazio)(for: 7.6)(opposed: 4.4)

 Teacher Recruitment

Dr. McGinn reported to the Committee that on April 8th he went to UMASS-Amherst to represent the District at the Five College Teacher Fair. There were approximately 300 future teachers there. Pentucket was the only District represented from the northeast region of Massachusetts.

 The District has placed the annual “anticipated vacancy” advertisement in the Boston Sunday Globe on April 4th. The ad included an invitation to attend the “Teacher Recruitment Fair on May 5th. To date the District has received over 200 applications.

 Dr. Littlefield said that this was not the time to spend the time and money on teacher recruitment and that the time would have been better spent on the curriculum and the budget. Mr. Castiglione said that the Superintendent and the administration followed the direction given to them by the School Committee with regard to professional development and recruitment.

 Pentucket Senior Series

Dr. McGinn reported that he met with the directors of the three towns Councils on Aging (COA). The District will offer a fall and spring series of adult education with different topics. The COA will take care of the advertising, sign-ups, transportation, etc. The District will provide the classroom space, staff, and funding.

 Final Approval Middle School Roof Project

Mr. Gibson said that the bond council requested the Committee to vote the sum of $700,000 the appropriated replacement of the middle school roof, that this is the appropriation to be raised by incurring debt by issuance of bonds/notes according to Section 16, Chapter 71 of the General Laws.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mr. Cronin to approve the sum of $700,000 the appropriated replacement of the middle school roof, that this is the appropriation to be raised by incurring debt by issuance of bonds/notes according to Section 16, Chapter 71 of the General Laws. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Levine, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Piccolomini, Muench, Conner, Cronin, Atwood, Littlefield)(abstained: Grazio)(for: 10.9) (abstained: 1.1)

 Old Business

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mr. Castiglione to table the Old Business. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Levine, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Piccolomini, Muench, Grazio, Cronin, Atwood, Littlefield)(opposed: Conner)(for: 11.2)(opposed: .8)

 Mrs. Grazio requested that the Superintendent provide information on specifically what will be discussed under Old Business. Mr. O’Keefe requested the administration to give members another copy of the Strategic Planning Subcommittee reports on the minutes of the meetings that discussed the Regional Agreement. Mrs. Muench requested information on the budget implication and the timeframe of the Central Office Reorganization.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mr. Cronin to continue the meeting past 10:00 p.m. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Levine, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Piccolomini, Conner, Cronin, Atwood)(opposed: Muench, Grazio, Littlefield)(for: 9.0)(opposed: 3.0)

 Executive Session, Chapter 39, Section 23, B.3.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mr. Castiglione to enter into Executive Session, Chapter 39, Section 23, B.3. for the purposes of discussing negotiations and pending litigation. Motion carried by roll call vote. (for: Castiglione, Levine, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Piccolomini, Cronin, Conner, Atwood)(opposed: Grazio, Muench, Littlefield)(for 9.0)(opposed: 3.0)

 Adjournment

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Dr. Littlefield and seconded by Mr. Buell to adjourn the meeting at 10:23 p.m. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 Respectfully submitted,

 Marianne Naffah

Recording Secretary

 

 

May 18, 2004

 

Approved: June 1, 2004

Distributed: Website, I Buerger, PAT

PENTUCKET REGIONAL SCHOOL COMMITTEE

                                                                               Middle School

                                                                               May 18, 2004

 

Members present: Chairman Darke, Mr. O’Keefe, Mr. Levine, Mr. Buell,

Mr. Cronin, Mrs. Conner, Mr. Atwood, Dr. Littlefield, Mrs. Grazio, Mr. Castiglione,

Mrs. Piccolomini, and Mrs. Muench

 Also present: Dr. MacLean, Dr. McGinn, Mr. Gibson, Student Representative,

Miss Burns, Spectators and Press

 Call to Order

Chairman Darke called the meeting to order at 7:38 p.m.

 Majority Vote

The majority vote was set at 6.1.

 Agenda

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mr. O’Keefe to accept the agenda as amended. The amendments were to add the Strategic Planning Reports to Old Business and to add the emails that Mr. Buell brought added to the Consent Agenda. Motion carried. (for: Darke, Muench, Piccolomini, Buell, O’Keefe, Levine, Castiglione, Cronin, Conner, Littlefield, Atwood)(opposed: Grazio)(for: 10.9)(opposed: 1.1)

 Monthly Budget Report

Mr. Gibson said that the enterprise funds were started with the goal of supporting the budget. Mr. Gibson recommended that the Committee review whether or not to keep the services that have been extended to the community for extended school day, etc. These accounts are not making money for the District. Mr. Gibson will give the Committee a written analysis on how the deficit will be handled at the next meeting.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mrs. Muench and seconded by Mr. Cronin to have a discussion on the potential FY04 deficit in excess of $430,000 at the next School Committee meeting. There was an amendment to have a discussion on the deficits in both the revolving and in the general funds. There will be a presentation on both with a total bottom line deficit.

Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 Consent Agenda

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Mr. O’Keefe to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. The amendments were to remove the Monthly Budget Report for discussion and to add the emails Mr. Buell brought to the meeting. Motion carried.

(for: Darke, Piccolomini, Castiglione, Buell, O’Keefe, Levine, Cronin, Conner, Atwood, Littlefield)(opposed: Grazio)(abstained: Muench)(for: 9.8)(opposed: 1.1)(abstained: 1.1)

 Dr. Littlefield asked about the space issue at the Bagnall School. Dr. MacLean said that he would report to the Committee on the space issues in all of the elementary schools.

 Delegation

The Committee gave recognition and thanks to Brian Young for serving on the School Committee for eighteen years. Dr. McGinn presented proclamations to Mr. Young from both the House of Representative’s Office and the Senate’s office.

New Business

School Committee Subcommittee Placements

Chairwoman Darke handed out the subcommittee assignments to all members.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Castiglione and seconded by Mr. O’Keefe to approve the subcommittee assignment given out by Chairwoman Darke. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Levine, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Piccolomini, Conner, Cronin, Atwood, Littlefield, Muench)(opposed: Grazio)(for: 10.9)(opposed: 1.1)

 Mr. Buell said that he would like to be on the Finance Subcommittee. Chairwoman Darke mentioned concerns with quorum issues on the Finance Subcommittee. Dr. MacLean said that he has had conversations with both the District’s legal counsel and the Department of Education. Dr. MacLean recommends if people want to attend a subcommittee meeting that they ask to be put on that subcommittee and that the Committee is kept with that particular membership. In that way, there will not be quorum issues.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Castiglione and seconded by Mr. Buell to recommend that the Strategic Planning Subcommittee be charged with conducting a review of the current goals, as well as a list of potential goals for the future to be brought back to the full Committee for the second meeting in June. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Levine, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Piccolomini, Conner, Cronin, Atwood, Littlefield)(opposed: Muench, Grazio)(for: 9.8)(opposed: 2.2)

 Mrs. Grazio disagreed with this motion. She said the goals should be discussed, reviewed and developed by the full Committee. Mr. Castiglione is advocating for this approach in order  to expedite the business of the Committee. Mr. Cronin added that anyone that has input is welcome to forward it to the Chair of the subcommittee.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Mr. Castiglione that each subcommittee shall meet once a month.  At the first meeting, set their list of goals to be accomplished over the next twelve months, and be brought to the full Committee for review. There was a friendly amendment to change the word from shall to should. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Levine, O’Keefe, Darke, Piccolomini, Muench, Conner, Cronin, Atwood, Littlefield)(opposed: Grazio)(abstained: Buell) (for: 9.8)(opposed: 1.1)(abstained: 1.1)

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded Mr. Castiglione to have the Communications Subcommittee report to the full Committee after every three meetings to improve communication in the school and in the community. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Levine, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Piccolomini, Muench, Conner, Cronin, Atwood, Littlefield)(abstained: Grazio)(10.9)(abstained: 1.1)

 Mr. O’Keefe asked the Committee to expand the subcommittee with a liaison role with the towns. Mr. Buell agreed.

 Budget

On May 10th the town of Merrimac voted down the override to fund the schools. Dr. MacLean gave the Committee a proposal reducing the budget approximately $649,000. This list was comprised after meeting with principals. It included cuts in staffing and programming district wide. Dr. MacLean said that class sizes at the elementary level would reach the mid twenties in some cases, the high 20’s at the middle school, and there would be no program cuts at the high school.

 Discussion followed:

·         Mr. Castiglione said that the Committee should abide by the Regional Agreement. He said that they need to respect the process as it is, although, he feels it needs to be changed. Several members agreed that the Regional Agreement needs to be changed and this is something that the Committee should work on immediately. Mrs. Grazio said if the District pushes the two-thirds vote, the long-term effect will be very negative. Mrs. Conner questioned the lesser of two evils; is it the relationship with the towns or are the cuts in the best interest of the students. Mr. Buell agreed that this was not the time to make a change and he would like the Committee to look at other resources besides the teachers.

·         Mr. O’Keefe said that the Merrimac selectmen would meet with the School Committee in the spirit of a compromise.

·         Mr. O’Keefe said that he would like to see more cuts district wide.

·         Dr. Littlefield asked if there was any consideration to anything besides teachers.

·         Mr. Castiglione would like to look at the administrative structure.

·         Mr. Cronin would like to look at reductions in course offerings that are not core to the academics. He does not want the class sizes to increase.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Castiglione and seconded by Mr. O’Keefe to move the figure to reduce the budget by $649,893. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Castiglione and seconded by Mr. Atwood to direct the Superintendent to meet with the Finance Subcommittee to bring a list of options to the full Committee for reductions in the budget. All members may attend this meeting. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, O’Keefe, Darke, Piccolomini, Conner, Cronin, Atwood, Littlefield)(opposed: Levine, Buell, Muench, Grazio)(for: 7.6)(opposed: 4.4)

 The Committee asked the Superintendent for information on the following items:

·         Dollar savings on freezing non-union wages.

·         Expected revenue on athletics and activities.

·         Expected revenue on transportation fees.

·         Out of district tuition cost and how the circuit breaker will or will not effect

the budget.

·         Review of district coordinators.

 PRSD Policy Manual

Dr. MacLean gave members a copy of the Policy Manual proposal.  After meeting with Mrs. Muench, Dr. MacLean asked the Committee to approve for a first reading those items that are new to the Committee, to essentially reiterate those polices A-D that are current policies and docket the remainder for the future.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mrs. Muench and seconded by Mrs. Grazio to recommend for first reading the policies in the Introduction (Mission Statement, School District Legal Status, Regional Agreement, People and their School District, ADA: School District Goals/Objectives), Section B: BBAA, BCA, BDA, BDB, BDF, BDFA-E-1, BDFA-E-3, BE, BEC, BEDA, BEDB, BEDC, BEDF, BEDF, BEE, BGC, BGE, BGF, BHC, BHE, BIA, BJ, BK, Section C: BA, CBD, CE, CH, CHA/B/C, CHCA, CHD, CL, CM, and Section D: DA, DGA, DH. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Piccolomini, Muench, Grazio, Conner, Cronin, Atwood, Littlefield)(abstained: Levine)(for: 10.9)(abstained: 1.1)

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mrs. Muench and seconded by Mr. Cronin to adopt the following policies: Section A: ACA – Harassment, ADC – Smoke Free School, ADD – Safe Schools, ADDA – Cori Requirements, AEB – Letters of Recognition. These policies are already in the Policy Manual. The date of original adoption needs to be added. The dates are as follows: ACA – 1/20/98, ADC – 12/17/96, ADD – 11/17/98, ADDA – 4/17/03, and AEB – 9/5/95. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mrs. Muench and seconded by Mr. O’Keefe to delete the following policies in section B: BA, BB, BBBC, BBBE, BEDH, and BID. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Piccolomini, Muench, Grazio, Conner, Cronin, Atwood, Littlefield)(abstained: Levine)(for: 10.9)(abstained: 1.1)

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mrs. Muench and seconded by Mr. Cronin to accept for a first reading the following policies: BDD – Number 2 changed from: The Superintendent will keep the Committee thoroughly informed about all legal, financial and operational matters that effect the District’s operations.(Accepted by the Committee with this change – 3/25/03); BDFA – Number 5 changed from: The School Council will establish performance measures to be used to access the effectiveness of its improvement plan. (Accepted by the full Committee with this change – 3/25/03); BEDB-E – Number 8: the word Old changed to Unfinished (Accepted by the Committee with this change – 3/25/03).

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mrs. Muench and seconded by Mrs. Grazio to keep the following policies on hold until they can be reviewed and changed to meet the needs of Pentucket School District: Section A – AC along with ACA, ACAB, ACE, ACEA to be combined into one policy in combination with our current ACA – Harassment, also policy AE; Section B – Policies BAA, BBA, BDG, BG, BGB, BGD, (CHB), BIBA; Section C – Policies CBI, CCB and CLA; Section D – Policies DB, DBD, DBG, DBJ, DI, DIE, DJ, DJA, DJG, DK, DKC. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mrs. Muench and seconded by Mrs. Grazio to form a policy subcommittee to finish the policy manual by the end of the calendar year. The committee would consist of three members. Motion failed. (for: Buell, Muench, Grazio)(opposed: Castiglione, Levine, O’Keefe, Darke, Cronin, Atwood, Littlefield)(abstained: Piccolomini, Conner)(for: 3.3)(opposed: 6.8)(abstained: 1.9)

 Dr. MacLean recommended that the Committee docket a section at a time and that it be part of the agenda every month. Members requested a review of the previous minutes on the vote of the policy procedure. Some members said that a subcommittee would be more efficient. Others felt it is the responsibility of the full Committee.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Mr. O’Keefe to continue the meeting passed 10:00 p.m. Motion failed. (for: O’Keefe, Darke, Piccolomini, Conner, Cronin, Atwood)(opposed: Castiglione, Levine, Buell, Muench, Grazio, Littlefield)(for: 5.7)(opposed: 6.3)

 Meeting ended.

 Respectfully submitted,

 Marianne Naffah

Recording Secretary

June 1, 2004

 

Approved: June 15, 2004

       Distribution: Website, I. Buerger, PAT

PENTUCKET REGIONAL SCHOOL COMMITTEE

                                                                               Middle School

                                                                               June 1, 2004

 

Members present: Chairman Darke, Mr. O’Keefe, Mr. Levine, Mr. Buell,

Mrs. Conner, Mr. Atwood, Dr. Littlefield, Mrs. Grazio, Mr. Castiglione,

Mrs. Piccolomini, and Mrs. Muench

 Also present: Dr. MacLean, Dr. McGinn, Mr. Gibson, Principals, Mrs. Townes, Mr. Binaghi, Mr. Harrison, Mrs. Jervey, Mrs. Perry,  Student Representative, Miss Burns, Spectators and Press

 Call to Order

Chairman Darke called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m.

 Majority Vote

The majority vote was set at 5.7.

 Agenda

It was moved by Mr. O’Keefe and seconded by Mrs. Conner to approve the agenda as amended. The amendment was to add an update on the Superintendent’s evaluation. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 Consent Agenda

It was moved by Mr. O’Keefe and seconded by Mr. Castiglione to approve the consent agenda. Motion carried. (for: Darke, Piccolomini, Castiglione, O’Keefe, Buell, Levine, Littlefield, Conner, Atwood)(opposed: Grazio, Muench)(for: 9.0)(opposed: 2.2)

 Dr. Littlefield mentioned that the dynamics in the conference room and the auditorium are not comfortable and that the administration needs to make the meetings more suitable for interaction between the Committee and the spectators. She would like the administration to investigate a more suitable place to hold meetings.

 Delegation

Several teachers and parents spoke to the Committee about the proposed budget cuts:

 ·         Teachers and community members urged the Committee to listen to the principals and the central office administration. They are knowledgeable and know what it best for their schools.

·         Clark Jenkins, teacher and Groveland resident, cautioned the Committee to endorse the principals and the central office administration. Community member, Jean Lambert,  encouraged the Committee to review the reorganization proposal at the high school so the NEASC accreditation is not jeopardized.

·         Mrs. Buerger said that the Superintendent’s proposal was reasonable, the cuts were not dramatic, and they did not effect or violate the teachers’ contract.

.FY05 Budget Update

Dr. MacLean reviewed his recommended cuts. He reiterated that class sizes at the elementary level would not exceed 24 and at the middle school level 27.

There was a brief discussion on choice. Dr. MacLean said the Page School is most likely to get a large number of the choice students coming in. He said that the grade levels for the incoming students have not been finalized. Classroom numbers are constantly changing due to retention, students moving in and out of the district, and children moving on to private schools. The administration also looks at the composition of the classroom including students on 504 plans and Individualized Education Plans. The central office contacts each building principal before any students are placed.  Both Mr. Castiglione and Mr. Buell said that they would not be able to make an informed decision on where to make the cuts regarding teachers when the choice students have not been placed.

 Dr. MacLean and Mr. Binaghi adjusted the projected class sizes at the middle school based on the two and a half team model at the seventh grade level. Estimated class sizes at the seventh grade would be 26.9 and 22.5 at the eighth grade level.

 Dr. MacLean and Mrs. Townes made recommended cuts by reducing several classes.

 The District is anticipating $100,000 more than what they had planned on through the circuit breaker.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. O’Keefe and seconded by Mr. Castiglione to reduce the amount of budget cuts by $306,530. This was based on the additional $100,000 from the circuit breaker, reinstating the transportation fees at 50% of last year’s fee totaling $55,345, E&D 50,000, transferring $101,185 from the athletic budget to revolving fund. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Levine, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Piccolomini, Conner, Atwood, Littlefield)(opposed: Muench, Grazio)(for: 9.0)(opposed: 2.2)

 Finance Subcommittee Report

Mr. Castiglione reported on the Finance Subcommittee meeting held on May 24th. He discussed the new information  including the increase in the circuit breaker money, shifting the athletic budget from the general fund to the athletic revolving fund, and the recommendation on the transportation fees.

 The subcommittee gave the full Committee a list of proposed adjustments for their consideration:

 ·         It included the administrative reorganization plan previously proposed by the Chair to consolidate the structure of the District and the middle/high school campus and to centralize curriculum coordination for the District. This would recognize a savings of $234,835.

·         Reinstate transportation fees at half of last year’s fee for a total of $55,345.

·         Accept the proposed reductions by the high school principal of 4.0 FTE teaching and guidance staff, a fee for Family and Consumer Science electives as well as fine art electives.

 Other recommendations for future discussions:

·         Eliminate master teacher stipends.

·         Shift middle school to a junior high model.

·         Eliminate assistant principals at all schools.

·         Category 2 reductions.

Dr. MacLean said that in looking at a headmaster for the middle and high school would necessitate working with the Department of Education. There would be several factors to consider; legal issues, contracts, and school hours.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Dr. Littlefield and seconded by Mrs. Grazio to support the administration and to direct the Superintendent to make recommendations on the balance of the cuts. Motion withdrawn.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. O’Keefe and seconded by Mrs. Conner to move to rescind the vote that was previously taken on programs and services. Motion failed. (two-thirds vote needed) (for: Levine, O’Keefe, Darke, Piccolomini, Conner, Atwood, Littlefield)(opposed: Castiglione, Buell, Muench, Grazio)(6.6)(4.4).

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Dr. Littlefield and seconded by Mr. O’Keefe to support the administration and direct the Superintendent to make recommendations on the balance of the cuts with no cuts to programs and services. There was a friendly amendment to direct the Superintendent to come back with a plan to offer $343,000 in new revenue or reductions with the operating budget. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Levine, O’Keefe, Darke, Piccolomini, Conner, Atwood, Littlefield)(opposed: Buell)(abstained: Muench, Grazio)(for: 7.9)(opposed: 1.1)(abstained: 2.2)

 Spectators mentioned that the middle school and high school would be deeply effected by cuts to the administrations. Mr. Repucci mentioned that there are services provided through the overhead. Mr. Buell said that there are arguments on both sides of the issue. He said the Committee needs to try to minimize the damage the cuts will do to the education the students need and it boils down to what goes on inside the four walls of the classroom. Mr. Atwood said that the Committee should give the principals the ability to make the decisions.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mrs. Grazio as an amendment to Dr. Littlefield’s motion that there be no elimination of the four course offerings at the high school. Motion failed. (for: Buell, Muench, Grazio)(opposed: Castiglione, Levine, O’Keefe, Darke, Piccolomini, Conner, Atwood, Littlefield)(for: 3.3)(opposed: 7.9)

 FY04 Budget Update

Mr. Gibson gave the Committee an update on the FY04 Budget. Mr. Gibson said the E&D account is positive due to the extra revenue that the District did not anticipate from the state. Mr. Gibson is able to move the sick leave buyback into FY05 and he is anticipating $143,000 from Blue Cross Blue Shield working capital to come in before June 30th to offset the deficit in medical trust.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. O’Keefe and seconded by Dr. Littlefield to continue the meeting past 10:00 p.m. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Levine, O’Keefe, Darke, Piccolomini, Conner, Atwood)(opposed: Muench, Grazio, Littlefield)(for: 7.1)(opposed: 3.0)

 Mr. Buell was not present for the previous vote.

 Space Needs Report

Dr. MacLean gave the Committee a space analysis of the schools responding to an inquiry that was made.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mr. O’Keefe to suspend the balance of the agenda. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Levine, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Piccolomini, Conner, Atwood)(opposed: Muench, Grazio, Littlefield)(for: 8.2)(opposed: 3.0)

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mr. O’Keefe to continue the meeting past 10:30 p.m. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Levine, O’Keefe, Darke, Piccolomini, Conner, Atwood, Littlefield)(opposed: Buell, Muench, Grazio)(for: 7.9)(3.3)

Executive Session, Chapter 39, Section 23, B.3.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mr. Castiglione to enter into Executive Session, Chapter 39, Section 23, B.3. for the purposes of discussing negotiations. Motion carried by roll call vote. (for: Castiglione, Levine, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Piccolomini, Conner, Atwood)(opposed: Muench, Grazio, Littlefield)(8.2)(opposed: 3.0)

 Adjournment

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Castiglione and seconded by Mr. O’Keefe to adjournment at 10:40 p.m. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 Respectfully submitted,

 Marianne Naffah

Recording Secretary

  

 

June 15, 2004

 

Approved: July 13, 2004

Distributed: Website, I. Buerger, P.A.T.

PENTUCKET REGIONAL SCHOOL COMMITTEE

                                                                               Middle School

                                                                               June 15, 2004

 

Members present: Chairman Darke, Mr. Levine, Mr. Buell, Mr. Cronin, Mrs. Conner,

Mr. Atwood, Dr. Littlefield, Mrs. Grazio, Mr. Castiglione, Mrs. Piccolomini

 Also present: Dr. MacLean, Dr. McGinn, Mr. Gibson, Principals, Mrs. Townes,

Mr. Binaghi, Mr. Harrison, Mrs. Jervey, Mrs. Kline, Special Education Administrator,

Kathleen O’Brien, Spectators and Press

 Absent: Mr. O’Keefe and Mrs. Muench

 Call to Order

Chairman Darke called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m.

 Majority Vote

The majority vote was set at 5.0.

 Agenda

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Mr. Castiglione to approve the agenda as amended. The amendments were to add a discussion on time line curriculum and to accept the donation from the Page PTO to the school student activities account. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 Consent Agenda

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Mr. Castiglione to approve the consent agenda as amended. The amendment was to remove the Mentoring/Summer Reading Lists/NCLB Report Cards/Tech Planning. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Buell, Levine, Conner, Cronin, Littlefield, Atwood, Darke, Piccolomini)(opposed: Grazio)(for: 8.7)(opposed: 1.1)

 Dr. McGinn clarified that Diane Milewski is a district wide speech pathologist. He also said that Donaghue School would be doing some recruiting for the mentoring program. Dr. McGinn said that he would like to see more people from the middle school on the mentoring team however, no one else applied. He will update the Committee when he knows what the workload will be in the fall.

 Delegation/Public Comment

Community member asked about the procedure for teachers being laid off. Dr. MacLean said that the district is obligated to notify teachers by June 15th of their employment status. Only non-professional status (non tenured) teachers received a layoff notice and all have been informed. Teachers that have received lay off notices are being encouraged by principals to apply for positions that will be available in the fall. Mr. Buell requested a list of the teachers that received pink slips.

 Dr. MacLean will seek an interim principal for the Bagnall School. A search committee will be formed to hire a permanent principal.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Castiglione and seconded by Mr. Cronin to accept the donation from the PTO at the Page School. The PTO donations are a result of requests made by Page School faculty via administration for enhancements to the core programming. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Buell, Levine, Grazio, Darke, Piccolomini, Conner, Cronin, Littlefield)(abstained: Atwood)(for: 9.0)(abstained: .8)

 Administrative Reports

FY05 Budget Recommendations

Dr. MacLean gave the Committee a copy of his recommended budget adjustments.

Revenue Increases:

  • Circuit Breaker
  • Athletic Fees
  • Bus Fees ($180)
  • H.S. Art and Consumer/Family Fees
  • E&D

Total $366,283

 Budget Reductions:

  • 2 H.S. Teachers
  • Class Size Grant
  • Late Bus
  • H.S. and Page ESP
  • Central Office Equipment
  • Category 2 Cut ($250 to $230 per Student)

Total $283,610

 Total Revenue Increases and Budget Reductions $649,893.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Castiglione and seconded by Mr. Cronin to reinstate the bus fees at the FY04 budget rate of $180. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Levine, Darke, Piccolomini, Conner, Cronin, Atwood, Littlefield) (opposed: Grazio)(abstained: Buell)(for: 7.6) (opposed: 1.1)(abstained: 1.1)

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mr. Castiglione to accept the Superintendent’s budget cuts. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Buell, Darke, Piccolomini, Conner, Cronin, Atwood, Littlefield)(opposed: Grazio)(abstained: Levine) (for: 7.6)(opposed: 1.1)(abstained: 1.1)

 School Lunch Prices

Mr. Gibson recommended a price increase of .50 per meal. School lunch prices have not increased in four years. Maintaining the current prices through FY05 would result in a loss. Mr. Gibson gave the Committee a profit and loss accounting of this enterprise fund. He anticipates that this year will end with only minor reserves. With anticipated increases in expenses for FY05, next year is likely to end in a deficit without an increase in revenue.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Mr. Castiglione to increase the elementary school lunch .25 per meal, the middle school and the high school lunch .50 per meal and the adult lunch .75 per meal. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Darke, Piccolomini, Conner, Cronin, Atwood, Littlefield)(opposed: Levine, Buell, Grazio)(for: 6.5)(opposed: 3.3)

 School Choice

Dr. MacLean gave the Committee charts representing the projected distribution of school choice students for 2004 – 2005. The distribution is based upon the latest, June 10th  data. The school choice lottery will be held after the results of the override vote in Merrimac. In the event it fails, there may be reductions in current levels of staffing and class size figures may have to be adjusted.

 Regional Agreement

The Committee received three documents regarding the Regional Agreement. One was a copy of the Strategic Planning Subcommittee recommendations for changes in the agreement. The second document was a copy of the letter from the Associate Commissioner of Education, Jeff Wulfson. The third was a copy of the Regional Agreement.

 The letter from Jeff Wulfson determines that the District is out of compliance with Chapter 71, 16B regional budgets and the apportionment of expenses, and urges the Committee to amend the agreement or seek special legislation to maintain its three out of three town budget approval provision.

 Dr. MacLean recommended that the Committee appoint a committee of three School Committee members to join a total of three representatives, one appointed by each of the three Boards of Selectmen, to develop new agreement language for each of the areas recommended for change by the Strategic Planning Subcommittee. He further recommended a target date for completion of 90 days.

 Dr. MacLean proposed that the Committee changes its current budget assessment process to conform to the Department of Education’s “two step” method. This two-step method acknowledges and responds to the divergent foundation status of each town (step one), and allocates the remaining assessments according to student enrollment (step two).

 Mrs. Grazio said it is important that this Committee discuss the agreement and come to an agreement as to what the Committee would like changed. We have the report of the subcommittee whose only charge was to look at specific areas. The full Committee has not had a discussion on the agreement. Before it goes to the town, the Committee needs to decide and put forth what and how the changes should be made. Mr. Wulfson also said that there has been no judicial determination on the specific questions on whether a regional district agreement imposes a stricter standard of adoption.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Mr. Castiglione to have meeting in July on July 13th and July 20th and to spend 90 minutes discussing the Regional Agreement. After those meetings the recommended changes should go to our legal council or to the towns. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 Job Descriptions

Dr. MacLean gave the Committee updated job descriptions for informational purposes only. Mr. Castiglione said that he was concerned because they did not list the skills or the educational requirements for the position. They were also missing the evaluation criteria and he questioned the line of authority. Dr. MacLean said that those issues could be easily included. Mrs. Grazio said that the Committee approves job descriptions especially if they are new. Mrs. Grazio questioned that the transportation coordinator was allowed to alter contracts. She also questioned the payroll position being divided by several people. She asked how many positions were new and if the central office reorganization was in place. Dr. MacLean said that on the issue of hiring there is no need for statutory because below the level of the Superintendent is directed by the Superintendent.

 Dr. MacLean said that this was the first step and at this point the administration has captured all the personnel that are currently working in the district. He said that the job and function analysis have not been done.

 Dr. Littlefield said that this was a good start and she hopes the Committee does not micro manage the details. Mr. Cronin said a job description is a management tool and he agreed it was a good start.

 Mr. Levine asked the Superintendent if these jobs descriptions as written were to be put in place the next day, would there be a change in the organization with the administration. Dr. MacLean said no.  

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Castiglione and seconded by Mr. Cronin to direct the Superintendent to take the job descriptions to the next step and to link them to the budgeted positions. This next step should include the skill requirements, educational requirements, the evaluation tools and the level of authority. It should include a spreadsheet and narrative with the employee’s name, title, salary, description, and the account where the position is funded. If there are any changes, the past history should be included. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 Grants/ELL/Title I Summer Reading

Dr. McGinn asked the Committee for approval on the Emergency Response Crisis Management Grant.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Dr. Littlefield to approve the Emergency Response and the Crisis Management Grant. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 Dr. McGinn gave the Committee a brief update on the requirements that all districts have now from recent legislation outlining our responsibilities to English language learners. The district is moving forward using the collaborative agreement with Amesbury, Triton, and Hamilton-Wenham. There are approximately six to ten students in the district that do not have English as their first language.

 Title 1 Summer Reading program serves students that are at risk in their reading skills. We have twenty students that have been assessed and afforded to this program this summer.

 Monthly Budget Report/Enterprise Funds

Mr. Gibson gave the Committee the details on the sixteen enterprise funds. Ten of the funds have a projected loss. Mr. Gibson would like to meet with the principals and decide which programs should be continued and set tuition rates for the programs we continue in FY05.

 Mr. Gibson said that when he gives the Committee the end of the year report he would comment on any discrepancies.

 Excess and Deficiency Report

Guisti, Hingston and Company gave the Committee a response to the request for the detail relating to the district’s Excess and Deficiency (E&D) account.  Mrs. Grazio would like to get a legal opinion.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mrs. Grazio and seconded by Mr. Buell to direct the Superintendent to request through MASC – as part of our dues – a legal opinion from Stephen Finnegan regarding the E&D account. The request is to include: 1. Is the E&D part of the General Fund? Is it, or should it be a separate account? 2. Is a vote of the school committee required to expend funds from E&D? A copy of the James Giusti letter should be included. There was a friendly amendment to have this  request go through the district’s legal council.  Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Levine, Buell, Darke, Piccolomini, Grazio, Cronin, Atwood, Littlefield)(opposed: Conner)(for: 9.0)(opposed: .8)

 Summer Meeting Schedule

The following is the summer meeting schedule:

  • July 13th and July 20th  Business meeting at 7:00
  • August 3rd  and August 31st  Business meeting at 7:30
  • August 10th Roles and Responsibilities of School Committee members Workshop 7:30
  • August 24th Raising the Bar Student Performance Workshop 7:30

 Timeline Curriculum

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Mrs. Grazio to direct the Superintendent to give the School Committee information, in the format of an  organizational chart, at the middle and high school level by department including what courses are offered, student attendance, how many sections, and how it is tracked by September 1st. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 The Committee would like this information before the next budget. Dr. MacLean said there are three things that need to be done:

  • At the Committee level the work that is being done by the Strategic Planning Subcommittee will lend the framework on education and how we look at the performance of education.
  • Single most important issues for the School Committee are student achievement.
  • Dr. MacLean would like to provide framework over the next few months for the Committee’s review. This would include curriculum maps K – 12. Dr. MacLean suggests a discussion on what the curriculum process is and what it can be in the future. This would help determine if the program is serving the needs that it was intended for. Dr. MacLean has talked with administrators about looking at all of the schools in the district in the same rigor as the high school. An audit of all the schools should be done. If the district has similarity in curriculum, there will be a better understanding of how the students move from one building to another.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mrs. Grazio and seconded by Mr. Buell to have the information on the elementary level prior to the end of December 2004. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mrs. Grazio to table policy. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 Superintendent’s Evaluation

Mr. Castiglione recommended postponing the Superintendent’s evaluation because two evaluations have not been turned in. One member did not identify himself or herself. Mr. Castiglione would like the two evaluations turned in and the member that did not identify himself to let Marianne know so that he may complete the process.  Mr. Castiglione and Chairwoman Darke have met with Dr. MacLean to go over his evaluation.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Mr. Castiglione to continue the meeting passed 10:00 p.m. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Darke, Piccolomini, Conner, Cronin, Atwood)(opposed: Levine, Buell, Grazio, Littlefield)(for: 5.7)(opposed: 4.1)

 Executive Session, Chapter 39, Section 23, B.3.

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Mr. Castiglione to enter into Executive Session, Chapter 39, Section 23, B.3. for the purposes of discussing negotiation strategies. Motion carried by roll call vote.(for: Castiglione, Darke, Piccolomini, Conner, Cronin, Atwood)(opposed: Littlefield, Grazio, Buell, Levine)(for: 5.7)(opposed: 4.1)

 Adjournment

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Mrs. Conner to adjourn the meeting at 10:15 p.m.

Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 Respectfully submitted,

 Marianne Naffah

Recording Secretary

 

   July 13,  2004

 

                                                           Approved as Amended: August 3, 2004

                                                       Distributed: Website, I. Buerger, PAT

PENTUCKET REGIONAL SCHOOL COMMITTEE

                                                                               Middle School

                                                                               July 13,  2004

 

Members present: Chairman Darke, Mr. Levine, Mr. Buell, Mr. O’Keefe, Mr. Cronin,

Mrs. Conner, Mr. Atwood, Mr. Castiglione, Mrs. Piccolomini, Mrs. Muench

 

Also present: Dr. MacLean, Dr. McGinn, Principals, Mrs. Townes, Mr. Binaghi,

Mr. Harrison, Mrs. Jervey, Mrs. Kline, Mrs. Perry, Special Education Administrator,

Ms. O’Brien, Student Representative Ms. Burns, Spectators and Press

 

Absent: Dr. Littlefield and Mrs. Grazio

 

Call to Order

Chairman Darke called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m.

 

Majority Vote

The majority vote was set at 5.1.

 

Agenda

It was moved by Mr. Castiglione and seconded by Mr. Levine to approve the agenda as amended. The amendment was to add the Strategic Planning Report for filing purposes. The Committee would like to discuss the Audit Report and Management Letter at the next meeting. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 

Consent Agenda

It was moved by Mr. Castiglione and seconded by Mr. Buell to approve the consent agenda as amended. The amendment was to remove the Surplus Report. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Buell, Levine, O’Keefe, Conner, Cronin, Atwood, Darke, Piccolomini)(opposed: Muench)(for: 9.0)(opposed: 1.1)

 

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. O’Keefe and seconded by Mr. Castiglione to send the surplus equipment list to families in the District receiving financial aid. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 

Delegation

Several community members and staff spoke on the budget issue. Norman Clark led the discussion by saying he contacted Representative Harriet Stanley’s office and they contacted the Board of Education. She sent Mr. Clark a letter dated June 2, 2004. The letter stated that the District has a legal school budget. The state law establishes a definitive standard and it preempts any action by a lower level of government. The school budget was approved by a two-thirds majority vote. Mr. Clark stated that the District should send Merrimac a bill with their share of the school budget. He said that Chapter 71,16B allows the majority to rule in matters with common interests with the schools and that this law is designed to protect children. Mrs. Conner agreed and would like the Committee to “take a stand” with the regional agreement.

 

Many others agreed and the general census was to encourage the Committee to follow the state law and not the regional agreement. Community members and staff also encouraged the Committee not to make cuts to the theatre arts program at the high school. They felt it would be detrimental to the students in that program.

 

Mr. Atwood encouraged community members to attend selectmen’s meetings.

 

 

Page 2

 

Donation Women’s Volleyball Group Page School

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mrs. Muench to accept the donation from the Women’s Volleyball Group of $200 for the purchase of a clock to be placed in the school gymnasium. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 

FY05 Budget Recommendations

Dr. MacLean gave the Committee two scenarios: partial budget reductions and full budget reductions. He recommended the full budget reductions assuming there would be no additional money from Merrimac.

 

Discussion followed:

·         Dr. Littlefield sent an email expressing concerns about the budget decisions impacting high school schedules and class sizes. Dr. Littlefield requested members approach personnel cuts with utmost consideration to the individual teachers whose full time job status may be impacted by the Committees decisions. Dr. Littlefield suggested that anyone cut be given consideration to be employed in another area of the District.

·         Mr. Castiglione said that the Finance Subcommittee offered other reductions and he would like to look at other alternatives such as cuts with support personnel, guidance, and administration. Dr. MacLean responded that these options have been on the table for quite some time and come from a process of deliberation by the people responsible for running the buildings, holding the classrooms and meeting the needs of all children. He said that other proposals might be beneficial in time for the District financially.

·         One community member asked if the cuts were properly analyzed. Dr. MacLean said that he worked with administration on all cuts. They have been chosen based on the least amount of impact to the students.

·         When asked if the Committee could ask Merrimac for $110,000. Mr. Castiglione said that Merrimac is in a difficult situation with their bond rating. He said that School Committee members met with the Town of Merrimac and asked them to look at other funding mechanisms. He said it was not well received and that their reserve funds are in a difficult situation.

 

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and second by Mr. Levine to accept the full budget reduction proposal totaling $618,969. Motion failed. (unanimous)

 

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Mr. Levine to have the Superintendent give the Committee a new document with budget reductions focusing the majority of the cuts on the elementary schools allowing the towns that have appropriated the money to fund the cuts. Motion failed. (for: O’Keefe, Cronin, Atwood)(opposed: Castiglione, Levine, Darke, Piccolomini, Conner)(abstained: Buell, Muench)(for: 2.7)(opposed: 5.2)(abstained: 2.2)

 

Dr. MacLean said that the law is silent on individual towns and their ability to give more money toward the appropriation than they have been assessed. However, the Regional Agreement does state that at the elementary level the town can make an appropriation separate from the appropriation that comes from the assessment.

 

Discussion followed:

·         Mr. Buell read Section 10,8A to the Committee from the Regional Agreement. “If in the opinion of the Board of Selectmen and/or Finance Committee of any of the dissenting towns, the resubmitted District budget will not fit the budgetary capabilities of their town, they can request of the School Committee a special meeting to discuss the resubmitted

 

Page 3

 

budget. Six members of the School Committee as well as two representatives of the

Board of Selectmen and two representatives of the Finance Committee from each

member town must attend. The purpose of this meeting will be to discuss the ability of the

dissenting town or towns to meet the financial obligation brought forth by their

assessment of the submitted District budget.  Mr. Buell said that if the Committee agreed

that this is a flawed document, the assessment given to Merrimac would stand according

to state law. Mr. Buell suggested calling a meeting with Merrimac to pursue this. Mr. Buell

would like to see and suggests community members attend that meeting. Mr. Castiglione

added that it is a two-step process. First step is to send revised assessment and then

Merrimac has seven days to call a meeting.

·         Mr. O’Keefe said that he is not prepared to tell the people who sit on both sides of the issue that their vote doesn’t count. It is not ethically or morally valid to go retroactive on this.

·         Some members expressed concern with “picking and choosing” which sections of the agreement to support. Mr. Buell said that if the District goes against the Regional Agreement the District will be in a mess.

 

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mr. Cronin to present a budget reduction of $1.00 to the towns. Dr. MacLean would ask Merrimac to hold a public meeting under the Regional Agreement Section 10A, part 8. The Committee would reconvene to appoint delegates to that meeting. Motion failed. (for: Levine, Buell, Muench)(opposed: Castiglione, O’Keefe, Darke, Piccolomini, Conner, Cronin, Atwood)(for: 3.3)(failed: 6.8)

 

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mrs. Conner and seconded by Mr. Cronin to move forward with the assessments as voted on June 1, 2004. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Levine, Buell, Darke, Piccolomini, Conner, Cronin, Atwood)(opposed: O’Keefe, Muench)(for: 7.9)(opposed: 2.2)

 

Mr. Buell would like in the record that he voted in favor of this motion after realizing Section 15 Severability of Sections of the Regional Agreement.

 

Mr. Minichello, Town Finance Director of Groveland, asked the Superintendent which budget the Committee was referring to. Dr. MacLean clarified that this budget was the original budget presented to the towns in which Groveland and West Newbury approved the overrides. It is the assessments that have been lowered due to the increase in state aid. The total budget figure is $26,836,000.

 

Mr. Atwood read section 15 of the Regional Agreement Severability of Sections. “According to Chapter 71.S161. in the event that any provision of this Regional School District Agreement shall be held invalid in any circumstance, such invalidity shall not affect any other provisions or circumstances.”

 

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mr. Levine to move forward with the two-step assessment process. Motion failed. (for: Castiglione, Levine, Buell)(opposed: O’Keefe, Darke, Piccolomini, Muench, Conner, Cronin, Atwood)(for: 3.3)(opposed: 6.8)

 

Mr. Minichello said that if the School Committee votes to reapportion funds, Groveland and West Newbury will pay more and Merrimac will pay less. He said that this could be devastating to the towns because the budgets have already been voted on. Mr. Buell commented that they couldn’t pick and choose which parts of the Regional Agreement to invalidate. Mr. Castiglione agreed.

 

 

Page 4

 

Dr. MacLean said that the law is less clear on this issue. He said that the Department of Education’s interpretation is that the District uses a two-step method. This takes into account the foundation budget ability of each of the three communities. The first part of the budget accounts for the ability that the District towns have to pay. The second is based on the Regional Agreement, which is based on the population of the students.

 

Mr. Atwood read the law on Chapter 71, Section 16B, fifth paragraph. Dr. MacLean suggested getting a definitive legal opinion from the District Attorney on whether or not it is the obligation of the District to impose the two-step method as opposed to the current method of assessment.

 

Mr. Plummer, Vice Chairman of the Groveland Finance Committee, said that if the two-step method passes, Groveland will have to have a special town meeting to fund and additional $190,000, West Newbury will ask for an additional $240,000 and Merrimac will get a reduction of $430,000.

 

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell to rescind  the vote on presenting a budget with $1.00 reduction and asking Merrimac to hold a public meeting to fund their portion of the budget based on Chapter 71, 16B.  There was no second to the motion.

 

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Levine and seconded by Mr. Cronin to direct the Superintendent to get an opinion from legal council on the two-step method process and to forward it to the School Committee and to the towns. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 

Contract Signature Authorization for the Middle School Roof

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Castiglione and seconded by Mr. Levine to give the Superintendent the authority to negotiate the contract for the middle school roof. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 

Dr. MacLean will share specs on the middle school roof with the Committee once the attorneys have reviewed them.

 

Mr. Buell left the room and did not vote on the previous motion.

 

Regional Agreement

Mr. O’Keefe reviewed with the Committee the list of subjects that were discussed at a business meeting for review by the subcommittee regarding the Regional Agreement. They were: 2/3 majority for budget approval, number of members, quorum requirement, method of assessment, chapter 71,16A which is the towns’ ability to fund elementary schools, review page 4 section C, language such as supplemental, and stabilization. The subcommittee recommended to the full Committee adopting Chapter 71,16A in its entirety. They also recommended with the method of assessment taking the total number of students including choice out students. The third recommendation was to have the quorum requirements be a simple majority of the full Committee.

 

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. O’Keefe and seconded by Mr. Buell to move the full Committee to adopt the stated recommendations by the subcommittee. They are to adopt Chapter 71,16B which includes the method of assessment to include choice out students and to have the quorum be the simple majority of the Committee. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Levine, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Piccolomini, Conner, Cronin, Atwood)(opposed: Muench)(for: 9.0)(opposed: 1.1)

 

Page 5

 

 

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mrs. Conner and seconded by Mr. Castiglione to continue the meeting past 10:00 p.m. Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, O’Keefe, Darke, Piccolomini, Conner, Cronin, Atwood)(opposed: Buell, Muench)(abstained: Levine)(for: 6.8)(opposed: 2.2)(abstained: 1.1)

 

Superintendent’s Evaluation

Mr. Castiglione clarified the process. Mr. Castiglione received the evaluations. The summary was based on data from nine members. He presented a compilation of the values assigned to each standard with the recommendations and commendations assigned to each standard. Mr. Castiglione said the process needs some debriefing and he will participate in that process. Mrs. Grazio amended the minutes to say that she would like to discuss this tool at a future meeting with the full Committee.

 

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Castiglione and seconded by Mrs. Conner to accept the superintendent’s evaluation as presented. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Castiglione and seconded by Mr. O’Keefe to award the Superintendent a $1,000. bonus as specified in the contract based on the total points received.  Motion carried. (for: Castiglione, Levine, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Piccolomini, Conner, Cronin, Atwood)(opposed: Muench)(for: 9.0)(opposed: 1.1)

 

Adjournment

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mr. Castiglione to adjourn the meeting at 10:15 p.m.

Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 

Respectfully submitted,

 

 

 

Marianne Naffah

Recording Secretary

 

        July 20, 2004

 

                                                 Approved as Amended: August 3, 2004

                                                       Distribution: Website, I. Buerger, PAT

PENTUCKET REGIONAL SCHOOL COMMITTEE

                                                                               Middle School

                                                                               July 20, 2004

 

Members present: Chairman Darke, Mr. Levine, Mr. Buell, Mr. O’Keefe, Mr. Cronin,

Mrs. Conner, Mr. Atwood, Dr. Littlefield, Mrs. Grazio, Mrs. Piccolomini, Mrs. Muench

 

Also present: Dr. MacLean, Dr. McGinn, Mr. Gibson, Mrs. Townes, Mr. Harrison,

Mrs. Jervey, Mrs. Perry, Ms. O’Brien, Spectators and Press

 

Absent: Mr. Castiglione

 

Call to Order

Chairman Darke called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.

 

Majority Vote

The majority vote was set at 5.5.

 

Agenda

It was moved by Mr. O’Keefe and seconded by Mrs. Conner to approve the agenda.

Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 

Consent Agenda

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mr. Cronin to approve the consent agenda as amended. The amendments were to remove the Finance Report and the Communication Report. Motion carried. (for: Buell, Levine, O’Keefe, Conner, Cronin, Atwood, Littlefield, Darke, Piccolomini)(opposed: Muench, Grazio)(for: 8.7)(opposed: 2.2)

 Finance Report

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Mr. Atwood to continue the Business Manager’s contract for an additional 90 days. Motion carried. (for: Buell, O’Keefe, Levine, Darke, Piccolomini, Conner, Cronin, Atwood, Littlefield)(Muench, Grazio)(for: 8.7)(opposed: 2.2)

 One town did not vote the bonding for the middle school roof project.  The Finance Subcommittee does not recommend taking the money out of the stabilization fund to start the project. Some members had the understanding that if the town did not respond in 45 days, the school could move forward with the bond. Dr MacLean said that the bond council has taken a conservative approach and he will get bond council.

 The Finance Subcommittee made a recommendation to the full Committee to start working on the FY06 budget at the first meeting in September 2004. The idea is to make a plan and present it to the towns. Mr. Cronin mentioned the Finance Subcommittee meeting with the Strategic Planning Subcommittee to  come up with ideas on revenue sources, planning the budget and how to make programmatic changes. They would then present this to the full Committee. Mrs. Grazio suggested discussing the governance at the middle and high school at this time. Mr. O’Keefe said that he would bring the goals of the Strategic Planning Subcommittee to the full Committee on August 3, 2004. Dr. MacLean will provide the Committee with FY06 salary information and information on programs and services early in the fall.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Dr. Littlefield to start working on the FY06 budget at the first meeting in September 2004.There was a friendly amendment to include a budget calendar. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 Communication Report

Mr. Buell updated the Committee from the Communications Subcommittee. He said the website will be revamped at a low cost. He suggested that members sign up to attend the board of selectmen’s meeting. They meet quarterly. There will be sign up information at the August 3, 2004 meeting. There is a meeting in both Merrimac and West Newbury on Monday, July 26, 2004 to discuss budget. Merrimac will meet at 6:30 p.m. and West Newbury invited the Committee to come in at 8:00 p.m.

 Audit Report and Management Letter

Mr. Guisti came to the meeting to report on the audit. All members received a report and a management letter. During the fiscal year ending June 30, 2003, the Pentucket Regional School District has implemented GASB 34 (Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement Number 340.  This statement requires all governments to account for and report capital assets in its Financial Statements. In addition, GASB 34 established new criteria on the form and content of governmental financial statements. There are many significant changes to the audited financial statements and the accounting methods used to generate the amounts.

    During their examination, they became aware of a material weakness in the school’s systems internal accounting controls relating to reconciliation procedures performed during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2003.

 Improvements were made in performing cash and general ledger reconciliation procedures. Mr. Guisti said that his offices provided a significant amount of assistance preparing closing and adjusting entries so that the books could be closed. There was also a lot of assistance with reconciling cash from the District’s general ledger accounting records to the Treasurer’s Cash Book. Mr. Guisti recommended that the District have a professional accountant with an accounting degree to perform the required monthly and year-end accounting and reconciliation procedures. He suggested hiring a business manager with accounting experience or hire a business manager and an accountant with high level accounting skills.

 The following are some accounting issues that should be addressed:

·         Some of the Special Revenue Fund Balance accounts have debit/deficit balances.

·         There are several payroll withholding accounts that have debit balances.

·         Many cash accounts in the general ledger have credit balances. These accounts normally have debit balances.

·         The various cash reconciliation items that have been identified and listed on spreadsheets over the past several months have not yet been recorded in the general ledger accounting system.

·         Accounting entries should be made to adjust the due to/due from general ledger accounts for the cumulative posting activity so that the proper net balance remains.

 During the audit testing and review of the personnel payroll files, certain files were incomplete, and noted:

·         One of the eight personnel files reviewed were not found.

·         Three of the eight W-4’s reviewed were not found.

·         Two of the five employees reviewed that have direct deposit of their payroll checks did not have an authorization.

·         Four of the eight employees reviewed did not have I-9’s.

FY05 Budget Update

Dr. MacLean gave the Committee a list of FY05 Recommended Budget Adjustments. Dr. MacLean said that the District is currently receiving one-twelveth payment of the assessments (FY04). The District will wind up $600,000 short during the school year.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mrs. Grazio to rescind the vote to move forward with the assessments as voted June 1, 2004. Motion carried. (for: Levine, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Piccolomini, Muench, Grazio, Cronin, Atwood, Littlefield)(opposed: Conner)(for: 10.1)(opposed: .8)

 Discussion followed:

·         Mrs. Conner felt this motion was irresponsible after it was carefully made. She said that the Committee should not cave in after making the decision a week ago.

·         Dr. MacLean said this allows the Committee to take a look at the Regional Agreement with the communities and to make changes to it. Most members agreed that it would be best to make the cuts while working on the changes to the Regional Agreement presenting them to the towns for the spring election.

·         Mrs. Grazio hoped to rescind the vote. She said that it was not right “to change the rules in the middle of the game”. The towns need a safeguard against paying an assessment that they cannot afford.

·         Members mentioned the legal costs of pushing the state law over the agreement and also losing valuable staff.

·         Mrs. Grazio asked if transportation fees could be charged to students in regional school districts. Dr. MacLean will check that with the District legal council.

·         Dr. MacLean reviewed his budget adjustments. There will not be an increase in fees. The cuts in the schools were made with every effort to make as little disruption as possible in both the classrooms and programs.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mrs. Grazio to approve the Superintendent’s FY05 recommended budget reductions. Motion carried. (for: Levine, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Piccolomini, Muench, Grazio, Cronin, Atwood, Littlefield)(opposed: Conner)(for: 10.1)(opposed: .8)

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Atwood and seconded by Dr. Littlefield to accept any additional funding for teachers at elementary schools from towns if such towns come forward with such money. There was a friendly amendment to have this reviewed by the District’s legal council. (for: Levine, O’Keefe, Darke, Piccolomini, Conner, Cronin, Atwood, Littlefield)(abstained: Buell, Muench)(for: 7.6)(abstained: 2.2)

 Mrs. Grazio was not present for the previous motion.

 Regional Agreement

Mr. O’Keefe reviewed with the Committee that they agreed to adopt Chapter 71, 16B that includes the method of assessment to include choice students and to have the quorum be the simple majority of the committee.

 Mr. Cronin suggests that the School Committee be reduced to six members, two per town with equal weight to the votes. Dr. MacLean  said there would be a choice; an at large membership with a district wide election or weighted vote. Mr. Buell disagreed and said there would be misrepresentation in each town. Mr. O’Keefe said that he agreed with Mr. Cronin. He said that the discussion with twelve members is redundant and gets in the way of the Committee being effective. Dialogue would increase with few members. There would be more demand for the positions. Mrs. Grazio said that they should review how they operate as a Committee. There could be room for the Committee to work more efficiently and effectively together. Mrs. Darke reminded members that this is a suggestion that will be made to the towns and the towns will decide.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. O’Keefe and seconded by Mr. Cronin to recommend to the towns reductions in membership from twelve to six members. Motion carried. (for O’Keefe, Darke, Piccolomini, Cronin, Atwood, Littlefield)(opposed: Levine, Buell, Muench, Grazio, Conner)(for: 5.7)(opposed: 5.2)

 Motion/Vote 

It was moved by Mrs. Grazio and seconded by Mr. O’Keefe to strike the segment from the agreement to allow one town to give more funds to their elementary school. Motion carried. (for: Levine, Buell, O’Keefe, Muench, Grazio, Littlefield)(opposed: Darke, Piccolomini, Conner, Cronin, Atwood)(for: 6.3)(opposed: 4.8)

 Mrs. Grazio said the town has to vote on the budget and the assessment that the Committee voted on. Mrs. Grazio said the Committee should operate as a District allocating resources appropriately based on the needs of the individual buildings.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mrs. Grazio and seconded by Mr. Buell to discuss with the towns a formalized lease with the elementary schools. The Committee would like to see a template before it is presented to the towns. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 Mrs. Grazio suggestion is to have the lease with the elementary schools done separately and not in conjunction with the Regional Agreement. Mr. Atwood agreed.

 Policy

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mrs. Muench and seconded by Mr. Buell to adopt the following policies: Mission Statement, School District Legal Status,  People and their School District, School District Goals/Objectives, Regional Agreement, Section B- BBAA, BCA, BDA, BDB, BDF, BDFA-E-1, BDFA-E-3, BE, BEC, BEDA, BEDB, BEDC, BEDF, BEE, BGC, BGE, BGF, BHC, BHE, BIA, BJ, BK, BDE, BEDG, Section C – CA, CBD, CE, CH, CHA/B/C, CHCA, CHD, CL, CM, Section D – DA, DGA, DH, and BDD, BDFA, BEDB-E as amended 3/25/03 and accepted 5/18/04. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 Adjournment

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mr. Cronin to adjourn the meeting at 9:58 p.m.

Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 Respectfully submitted,

 Marianne Naffah

Recording Secretary

                      

August 3, 2004                                                   Approved: September 7, 2004

                                                                      Distribution: Website, PAT, I. Buerger

PENTUCKET REGIONAL SCHOOL COMMITTEE

                                                                               Middle School

                                                                               August 3, 2004

 

Members present: Chairman Darke, Mr. Levine, Mr. Buell, Mr. O’Keefe, Mr. Cronin,

Mrs. Conner, Mr. Atwood, Dr. Littlefield, Mrs. Grazio, Mrs. Piccolomini, Mrs. Muench,

Mr. Castiglione

 Also present: Dr. McGinn, Mr. Gibson, Mr. Repucci, Spectators, and Press

 Call to Order

Chairman Darke called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.

 Majority Vote

The majority vote was set at 5.5.

 Agenda

It was moved by Mr. O’Keefe and seconded by Mr. Cronin to approve the agenda as amended.

The amendments were to add a statement from Dr. Littlefield and an Executive Session for the purposes of discussing the pending litigation and the ESP’s contract. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 Consent Agenda

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mrs. Conner to approve the consent agenda as amended. The amendments were to remove the Finance Report, Communication Report, Minutes dated July 13th and July 20th 2004. Motion carried. (for: Buell, Levine, O’Keefe, Conner, Cronin, Atwood, Littlefield, Darke, Piccolomini)(opposed: Muench, Grazio)(for: 8.7)(opposed: 2.2)

 Minutes

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mr. Levine to accept the minutes of July 13, 2004 as amended. The amendment was to delete the statement under the Superintendent’s Evaluation: “Two members did not turn them in.” The following statements were added: “The evaluation summary was based on evaluations from nine School Committee members. Mrs. Grazio would like to discuss the evaluation tool at a future meeting with the full Committee.” Motion carried. (Muench, Darke, Piccolomini, Buell, O’Keefe, Levine, Conner, Cronin, Atwood)(abstained: Grazio, Littlefield)(for: 9.0)(abstained: 1.9)

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mr. Cronin to accept the minutes of July 20, 2004 as amended. The motion/vote on the policy was rewritten: “It was moved by Mrs. Muench and seconded by Mr. Buell to adopt the following policies: Mission Statement, School District Legal Status,  People and their School District, School District Goals/Objectives, Regional Agreement, Section B- BBAA, BCA, BDA, BDB, BDF, BDFA-E-1, BDFA-E-3, BE, BEC, BEDA, BEDB, BEDC, BEDF, BEE, BGC, BGE, BGF, BHC, BHE, BIA, BJ, BK, BDE, BEDG, Section C – CA, CBD, CE, CH, CHA/B/C, CHCA, CHD, CL, CM, Section D – DA, DGA, DH, and BDD, BDFA, BEDB-E as amended 3/25/03 and accepted 5/18/04. Motion carried. (unanimous approval) There was a discussion on the Finance Subcommittee’s recommendations regarding their roles and responsibilities. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 The minutes from the spring 2003 will be reviewed regarding the subcommittee’s responsibilities. Mr. Atwood suggested each subcommittee make individual motions on their roles. Mrs. Grazio requested all members received the agendas on all subcommittee meetings. 

 Finance Report

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Mr. Buell to direct the administration to give the Committee a copy of the FY04/05 budget, as it exists, one page comparing this year and last year. This information will be in the next packet.  Any member that wants the full binder may contact the central office. Motion carried. (unanimous approval) 

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mr. Cronin to accept and file the Finance Subcommittee Reports dated August 3, 2004 and June 20, 2004. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 Communications Report

Mr. Buell gave the Committee a brief update on the Communications Subcommittee. For the purposes of improving communication with the towns, the subcommittee recommends a delegation from the Committee attend a Board of Selectmen meeting in each town, four times a year.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mr. O’Keefe to have Mr. Buell contact the Board of Selectmen in each town and email the Committee with a tentative schedule. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 Donation

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mr. Atwood to accept the donation from the U.S. Coast Guard Auxiliary #38 in the amount of $300 for the Computer and Technology Department at the middle school. Motion carried. (Muench, Darke, Piccolomini, Buell, O’Keefe, Levine, Conner, Cronin, Atwood, Littlefield)(abstained: Grazio))(for: 9.8)(abstained: 1.1)

 Administrative Reports

Mentoring Program Update

Dr. McGinn gave the Committee a brief update on the Mentoring Program. The Committee received a list of the mentors for the 2004/05 school year by school and grade level. Principals will use this list as they assign mentors to new hires. All of the District’s mentors, except for one who will be inactive this year, have participated in the training offered this summer.

Middle School Roof Update

Mr. Gibson informed the Committee that the vote they took last fall to bond the middle school roof was not valid because it had to be voted by the three towns within sixty days of the Committee’s vote. The District did not follow the procedure in the Regional Agreement according to the bond council.

 Mr. Castiglione arrived at 8:10 p.m. The majority vote changed to 6.1.

 Mr. Buell suggested asking the towns to hold a special town meeting. Some members were concerned about the expense and the quorum issue.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mrs. Grazio to have the administration approach the towns and asked them to hold a special town meeting before September 15, 2004. Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 Regional Agreement

Mr. Cronin reviewed the previous discussion with members. He said that the number of members would be reduced to six. According to Chapter 71, Section 14E there are 5 options. Number one is electing committee members by voters in member communities with each community’s representation apportioned according to population. The second is electing members in district-wide elections to be held at the biennial state elections. The third is electing members with residency requirements in district-wide elections to be held at the biennial state elections. The four is weighing the votes of committee members according to the population they represent. The last option is appointing members by locally elected officials such as school board members. Mr. Cronin recommended option three. Members questioned the term residency and suggested checking with legal council.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mrs. Grazio and seconded by Mr. Levine to direct the administration to get legal council to “explain in English” what each of the options means for our District (Chapter 71, Section 14E). Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 Mr. Cronin recommended changing the wording allowing town contributions. He recommended a member town (or any other organization) may contribute additional funds to the District, above and beyond its assessment for member town’s, to support specific programs +/or services, subject to a majority vote of the School Committee. Mrs. Grazio said that she disagrees and that the funds should be allocated for the needs of all children. Mrs. Grazio said other elementary schools would be at a disadvantage if some towns put in more money for their elementary schools.  This issue was taken off the table.

 Mr. Cronin suggested refining and revoting wording on assessment allocation to comply with state law: “The member towns agree to assess the sum of their required minimum contrivutions, as defined by state law, proportional to the student population of each town (this to include all choice/charter out students as part of the student population) in keeping with MGL Chapter 71, Section 16B, Amendment C551, Section 220. Any amount assessed to member towns that exceeds the required minimum contributions will use the same proportional student population formula.” Mr. Cronin said that the next suggestion he had was with regard to the assessments according to population. Mr. Cronin said that he would like to see the minimum required contribution be apportioned according to population as opposed to the foundation budget and any amount above and beyond the minimum requirement would be apportion according to population. This would keep in line with the way we assess the funds which is according to population. Mrs. Grazio asked what the advantage would be to the two-step method. Mr. Cronin said that it is foundation and population.

 Some members felt that it would solve the town’s problems short term. Some members said that the state law is consistent and the district should be consistent.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mrs. Grazio and seconded by Mr. Buell to have the administration set up a tri-town meeting with the Selectmen, Finance Directors, and Finance Committee members to “brainstorm” assessment methods. Motion carried. (for: Levine, Piccolomini, Muench, Grazio, Conner, Atwood, Littlefield)(opposed: Castiglione, Buell, O’Keefe, Darke, Cronin)(for: 6.8)(opposed: 5.2)

 Chairman Darke suggested having the tri-town meeting on August 24th. Members agreed.

 Mrs. Grazio proposed that an additional article be added that would require the Agreement to ve reviewed on a regular basis with the time and method articulated in the article.  Chairwoman Darke said that she would put that on the next agenda. Mr. Cronin asked to have Section 12 of the agreement on the next agenda and he would like to discuss ways that the elementary schools are set up and characterized.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mrs. Grazio to table Program and Services. Motion carried. (for: Grazio, Muench, Darke, Piccolomini, Castiglione, Buell, O’Keefe, Levine, Cronin, Littlefield, Atwood)(opposed: Conner)(for: 11.2)(opposed: .8)

 Dr. Littlefield gave her resignation. Dr. Littlefield said with mix feelings she would like to resign from the School Committee. Dr. Littefield would like to apply for the principal position that is open at the Bagnall School. Dr. Littlefield said that her true passion is education and that she hopes to contribute to the District through the principal’s position at the Bagnall.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mr. Cronin to enter into Executive Session, Chapter 39, Section 23, B.3.  Motion carried by roll call vote. (unanimous approval)

 Adjournment

Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mr. Levine to adjourn the meeting at 10:00 p.m.

Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 Respectfully submitted,

 Marianne Naffah

Recording Secretary

 

August 24, 2004

 

PENTUCKET REGIONAL SCHOOL COMMITTEE

                                                                               High School

                                                                               August 24, 2004

 

Members present: Chairman Darke, Mr. Levine, Mr. O’Keefe, Mrs. Conner, Mr. Atwood,

Mrs. Grazio, Mrs. Piccolomini, Mr. Castiglione

 Also present: Dr. MacLean, Dr. McGinn, State Representative Stanley, Groveland Selectmen, Dr. Darke, Mrs. Gorski, Mrs. Sheehan, Groveland Finance Director Mr. Labrecque, Groveland Finance Committee Members, Mr. Minichiello, Mr. Wildes, Mr. Kowalski, Mr. Plummer, Merrimac Selectmen, Mr. Dunn, Mr. Sinibaldi, Mrs. Traynor, Merrimac Finance Director Mrs. McLeod, Merrimac Finance Committee Members, Mr. Cryan, Mr. Hackett, Mr. Bearse, Mrs. Heusser, West Newbury Selectmen, Mr. Knowles, Mrs. O’Sullivan, West Newbury Finance Director Ms. Blais, Finance Committee Members, Mr. Ardry, Mr. Kapturowski, Dr. Archibald, Mr. Anderson, Spectators, and Press

 Call to Order

Chairman Darke called the meeting to order at 7:38 p.m.

Chairwoman Darke asked everyone to focus on two sections of the agreement that affected the towns’ finances and that are not in compliance with state law. The School Committee recommends having the budget approved if two out of three towns vote for it. The base budget requires two out of three towns’ approval. The supplemental budget requires all three towns’ approval.

 Mr. O’Keefe informed everyone that the Strategic Planning Committee was charged by the full Committee to take a look at specific areas of the Regional Agreement. The specific areas were as follows:

 

·         Changing the agreement to a two out of three vote on the budget.

·         Eliminating the separation of the base and supplemental budget to one single budget.

·         Utilizing the two-step method for assessment.

·         Reducing the School Committee to six members.

·         Removing the opportunity for towns to fund elementary schools within their towns.

·         Changing the quorum requirements to a simple majority.

 

Discussion followed:

 

·         Eleven years ago when the Regional Agreement was developed there was an extensive debate about the two out of three towns and it was decided that as a District three out of three would be best. Several town officials questioned why a change would be necessary.

·         Chairwoman Darke said that that section of the agreement is illegal and does not comply with the law. It required special legislation, which was never done. At the time Senator Buell wanted all town leaders to be in favor of this special legislation and one town finance committee was not. Chairwoman Darke said that special legislation has to be done or that portion of the agreement needs to be changed.

·         Mr. Ardry asked if the two-step method was linked to how many School Committee members there were and the weighted vote.

·         Mrs. Grazio said that eleven years ago the towns agreed on a compromise that if the budget increased and that caused an increase in the assessments that increase would be placed on the supplemental budget.  

·         Mr. Plummer commented that the state funds 57% of the school budget and by the year 2007 that may decrease to 36%. Mr. Atwood reminded people that the District has a 6% per pupil expenditure. There is nowhere to cut and the buildings need repair.

·         There was a tri-town finance meeting last evening and all agreed that two out of three would be unsatisfactory. The Board of Selectmen in Merrimac agreed.

·         Mr. Ardry suggested the budget process start earlier.

·         Ms. O’Sullivan said that there should be a maximum number of absences allowed for School Committee members and if they go over that number they should be asked to resign. There have been habitual offenders. Mr. Castiglione agreed that quorum problems have left the Committee unable to conduct business.

·         Mr. Dunn said that the three towns met and told the Superintendent what they could afford. The School Committee came back with a larger number (1.6) and pursued it. He said that the School Committee is unwilling to live within their means.

  • Dr. MacLean said that the Regional Agreement was approved by the Commissioner at the Department of Education with the understanding that the District would seek special legislation. Representative Stanley received a letter, as did the District from the Department of Education recently reiterating that the District has to comply with the law or seek special legislation. It is not a directive. It is an advisory. Dr. Darke said that the town’s people should decide how to do this. Mr. Ardry suggests a ballot question.
  • The School Committee asked the town officials for input on whether to adopt a new method for assessments, the first step requiring each town to contribute a state determined minimum that it has to pay for the schools. Any additional money would be calculated on the basis of student population.

·         Dr. Archibald, Ms. O’Sullivan, and Mr. Ardry do not agree with the two-step method.

·         Ms. O’Sullivan said that this District is not a good match for the two-step method and does not attract additional federal or state money. Each town should pay their equal share. Originally there was a two-step method in place and it was changed in the mid 90’s to per pupil expenditure.

·         Mrs. Grazio said the schools should maintain town representation and one-man one vote.

·         Mr. Minichiello interpreted the vote in Merrimac as a vote of no confidence. He suggested the Committee inform the communities more and get the towns to be part of the process. Mr. Atwood said they have had informational sessions. Mr. Ardry said there is a credibility gap, the numbers changed and the decisions on whether or not make cuts.

·         Several officials recommended a tri-town task force with a limited number of members and with a deadline. It was suggested that the Committee start at the top of the agreement and go through the whole agreement and then give the recommendations to the towns.

 

Chairman Darke concluded the meeting at 9:30 p.m. The School Committee will decide how to proceed at the next business meeting.

 

 

 

 September 7, 2004

 

PENTUCKET REGIONAL SCHOOL COMMITTEE

                                                    Middle School

                                                                                September 7, 2004

 

Members Present: Chairwoman Darke, Mrs. Grazio, Mrs. Muench, Mrs. Piccolomini, Mrs. Conner, Mr. Cronin, Mr. Atwood, Mr. Castiglione, Mr. Buell, Mr. O’Keefe

 

Also Present: Dr. MacLean, Dr. McGinn, Student Representative, Ms. Burns, Spectators and Press

 

Absent: Mr. Levine

 

Call to Order

Chairwoman Darke called the meeting to order at 7:38 p.m.

 Majority Vote

The majority vote was set at 5.1.

 Agenda

It was moved by Mr. Cronin and seconded by Mr. O’Keefe to accept the agenda as amended. The amendments were to add a discussion on the Chief Financial and Business Officer’s Position, a Subcommittee Report on Strategic Planning, and a discussion on the Central Office Reorganization. Motion carried. (for: Darke, Muench, Piccolomini, Conner, Cronin, Atwood, Castiglione, O’Keefe)(opposed: Grazio, Buell)(for: 7.9)(opposed: 2.2)

 Consent Agenda

It was moved by Mr. O’Keefe and seconded by Mr. Cronin to accept the Consent Agenda as amended. The amendments were to remove Mr. K’s Auto School and the River Valley Charter School Annual Report. Motion carried. (for: Darke, Buell, Piccolomini, Conner, Cronin, Atwood, Castiglione, O’Keefe)(opposed: Grazio, Muench)(for: 7.9)(opposed: 2.2)

 Chairwoman Darke commented on the way the River Valley Charter School did their goals and reviewed them. Mr. O’Keefe commented that the Strategic Planning Committee had done that in the spring and is waiting for an opportunity to discuss it with the full Committee. Chairwoman Darke would like to place it on the next agenda.

 Delegation

Dr. MacLean introduced Phil Benincasa to the School Committee. Mr. Benincasa will be the interim Principal at the Bagnall School for the next school year. Mr. Benincasa worked as a principal at the Concord School system for over 30 years. He was principal of the year in metro west in 1995. He received the educator of the year award from Boston University in 2003. Mr. Benincasa is very pleased to be at Pentucket.

 Business Manager’s Position

Mr. Buell passed out two documents. The first was a list of School Committee Hiring Requirements. The second was from Attorney Finnegan to the MASC regarding School Committee Personnel Authority Concerning the Position of the Business Manager and Budget Authority. Dr. MacLean said that the position has been readvertised. The first person that was offered the job declined. He is planning to reconvene the subcommittee next week to review applications. The Committee gave the Superintendent the authority to lead the process and make the recommended choice to the full Committee. Mr. Buell asked members to consider having the full Committee do the search if this second search fails.  

Administration

Middle School Roof

Dr. MacLean gave the Committee the language that needs to be voted on to proceed with the middle school roof project.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Buell and seconded by Mr. Cronin to accept the language of the middle school roof debt authorization language. “Voted that the sum of $700,000 is appropriated for replacement of the middle school roof; and that this appropriation be raised by incurring debt by the issuance of bonds or notes under Section 16 of Chapter 71 of the General Laws as amended.” Motion carried. (unanimous approval)

 Dr. MacLean informed the Committee that the three towns have agreed to place this on their October town meetings.

 FY05 Budget

Dr. MacLean gave members a copy of the FY05 Budget. This final version reflects adjustments made because of town meeting and ballot decisions and prior and subsequent School Committee votes.

 Mrs. Grazio would like to see the detail for the central office and district wide. She would also like to see the narrative on those sites. Mrs. Grazio would also like to see the end of the year report. Dr. MacLean said that it would be submitted to the state at the end of September. Mr. Castiglione asked to see preliminary numbers through August 4, 2004.

 Motion/Vote

It was moved by Mr. Castiglione and second by Mr. Cronin for a list of the salaries that make up each line item in the central office and in the district wide FY05 Budget.  Mr. Castiglione requested the preliminary actual face sheet on the end of the year report. Motion carried. (for: Darke, Muench, Piccolomini, Conner, Atwood, Cronin, Castiglione, Buell, O’Keefe)(opposed: Grazio)(for: 9.0)(opposed: 1.1)

 Programs and Services

Dr. McGinn distributed the format that the central office is employing to collect data on the scope of Pentucket programs and services. After a brief discussion, the Committee requested the following additional information:

 

q       List of programs that are mandated  (state frameworks or law)

q       How is staff assigned (FTE, resources, indirect and direct costs)

q       Enrollment in each program. How many students are requesting electives and are any turned away?

q       Descriptions of materials required for the programs. What is supplied? What other sources are used to provide supplies? What is student responsible for?

 

Motion/Vote

<